AFAIK gamut can not be represented as a percentage. Where are you getting that info?
The motion blur was there in the first place, you just don't notice it because there's also _motion_. When you remove the motion (shaking, jerking the camera), you're left with just the blur.
That's false actually. There is a "new" syntax, but the popularity of the language is in many ways due to the terse, easy-to-read original syntax—it's not going away and it's not deprecated.
AFAIK gamut can not be represented as a percentage. Where are you getting that info?
The motion blur was there in the first place, you just don't notice it because there's also _motion_. When you remove the motion (shaking, jerking the camera), you're left with just the blur.
That's false actually. There is a "new" syntax, but the popularity of the language is in many ways due to the terse, easy-to-read original syntax—it's not going away and it's not deprecated.