Maybe add error bars to give it a little more color?
I always felt that the Feynman Lectures were really, "an incredibly deep understanding of freshman level physics, targeted towards physics graduate students." (As opposed to freshman level physics targeted towards…
This is the key. The person you explained it to could probably not turn around and explain it to someone else, but could walk away thinking that they understood it.
In the workplace, there is also the problem of coworkers' (managers in particular) desire to listen to you explain it.
Well he made that statement in 1965, and then wrote QED, which is a layman's explanation of his Nobel Prize work, in 1985. So perhaps he set out to prove himself wrong. QED does explain quantum electrodynamics without…
I think it's partly motivational. There is definitely a level of understanding where it feels like you understand a concept, and then when you try to teach it to someone else, you realize when they ask basic questions…
Maybe add error bars to give it a little more color?
I always felt that the Feynman Lectures were really, "an incredibly deep understanding of freshman level physics, targeted towards physics graduate students." (As opposed to freshman level physics targeted towards…
This is the key. The person you explained it to could probably not turn around and explain it to someone else, but could walk away thinking that they understood it.
In the workplace, there is also the problem of coworkers' (managers in particular) desire to listen to you explain it.
Well he made that statement in 1965, and then wrote QED, which is a layman's explanation of his Nobel Prize work, in 1985. So perhaps he set out to prove himself wrong. QED does explain quantum electrodynamics without…
I think it's partly motivational. There is definitely a level of understanding where it feels like you understand a concept, and then when you try to teach it to someone else, you realize when they ask basic questions…