How is "playing the numbers game" no longer the good advice? This article (and your comments) only seem to cement that idea further.
Internet services in the US aren't even a public utility. I don't see this ever happening.
Maybe in a market with real competitors. But like others have said, what usually happens is people with existing unlimited plans lose them overnight to ISP's with a monopoly in their area. Then, ISP's charge $50 more…
Pray for the team that has to handle this ticket.
If you like synths on the web, check this out. https://learningsynths.ableton.com/
It's never been awful for me. Even when running it on an iPhone 6S, it has always been nice and responsive.
Convenience and access to Apple's user base who partake in the service. Those are the main reasons I used Google and Facebook sign-in on my website.
It says on the page, the service costs 0.4% per transaction.
To be fair, you can't blame them for disallowing things like that. Protection against cross-site scripting, I'm sure.
How is "playing the numbers game" no longer the good advice? This article (and your comments) only seem to cement that idea further.
Internet services in the US aren't even a public utility. I don't see this ever happening.
Maybe in a market with real competitors. But like others have said, what usually happens is people with existing unlimited plans lose them overnight to ISP's with a monopoly in their area. Then, ISP's charge $50 more…
Pray for the team that has to handle this ticket.
If you like synths on the web, check this out. https://learningsynths.ableton.com/
It's never been awful for me. Even when running it on an iPhone 6S, it has always been nice and responsive.
Convenience and access to Apple's user base who partake in the service. Those are the main reasons I used Google and Facebook sign-in on my website.
It says on the page, the service costs 0.4% per transaction.
To be fair, you can't blame them for disallowing things like that. Protection against cross-site scripting, I'm sure.