Generations, presumably.
Interesting, thanks for mentioning that. I've always wondered about the origins of the name, never found anything, but now with your mention of "mineral" I was able to find this: > (Hipp) How do I pronounce the name of…
How do you know it's not SQL-lite with the single L serving a double role? Common pronunciations allow you to stay perfectly ambiguous about where the L goes, which aligns quite well with the name as spelled. If you do…
I think we're all aware of that. The post you're responding to essentially made the same point you did, but to someone who thought it appropriate to express their love for realism in a much less mature way.
I was never part of one, but in case nobody with more experience chimes in: I'm assuming the large battles involve a lot of sitting around, pressing the occasional button to change to the next designated target, while…
From the link in my previous post[0]: > False: Select PEP 249-compliant transaction behaviour, implying that sqlite3 ensures a transaction is always open. This means you don't get to control the isolation level of the…
They're probably talking about the addition of the autocommit flag, which hides more fine-grained transaction control in favor of more uniform behavior across multiple databases:…
Trippy!
Chunks of good advice, tossed and blended into a soup of verbiage generated by a helpful LLM. It sounds smooth and resists being read at the same time. I hope we can get to the point where actually good, helpful prose…
The article also addresses why this is not the chosen solution. It's pretty much the first one you'd think of: all kinds of existing software (that can be between client and server and out of their control) already…
Some do: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_Airframe_Parachute_Syst...
I think it's a useful heuristic, but if you apply it too harshly, you'll deprive yourself of interesting perspectives. It's also hard to correct, because you don't get to know how many false positives it produces. So,…
But that's not were the confusion is created. I don't even see the status field on mobile without scrolling. You don't have a missing status field, you have too much confusion, because the field and/or the color have a…
Using only color to communicate the status is confusing. If you want to communicate something, it's often best to just say it. The color can be a visual reinforcement of that. Then your explanation would not be needed.
Gesundheit.
Good luck to you, too.
Okay, I've reflected on our conversation. Please let me try to explain my position. At the end, you'll have my answer to what you wanted me to ask myself. You have your opinion, and you're free to express it. However,…
> You think people pointing out problems in a broken system are the problem. Not what I said, nor does it follow from what I said. Also, not really what you were doing. There's a difference between pointing out…
Well, you could stop undermining what you seem to care for. You don't have to "wrongly imagine" anything. Everyone not doing what's "best for society" is how the world works, authoritarianism and the rule of rich elites…
It's stupidly obvious. Politics is about how we organize government and distribute power to solve the problems of living together as a society of individuals. "Big" vs "small" government is a particular way of…
There's vastly more to politics than that. There's even more to "small" vs "big" government than that, or to who really promises and delivers what. This convenient reduction to handy little words obscures all that, to…
I don't think that "liberal" and "conservative" are empty labels outright. However, they seem to be for the author of the post I was responding to: no substance, just bags to hold reflexive emotions that disguised…
At some point you might realize that you're just thinking about empty labels that you fill with stuff that makes you feel better.
At least not worthwile for the purpose you have in mind. Okay, now I understand better what you mean, something like: for some purposes, there's not much to be gained by distinguishing between "bug" and "feature", one…
When a program clearly deviates from its spec, would you be okay with calling that a "bug"? There's always a gray area of what's intended by the spec, but a program can absolutely and blatantly deviate from the letter…
Generations, presumably.
Interesting, thanks for mentioning that. I've always wondered about the origins of the name, never found anything, but now with your mention of "mineral" I was able to find this: > (Hipp) How do I pronounce the name of…
How do you know it's not SQL-lite with the single L serving a double role? Common pronunciations allow you to stay perfectly ambiguous about where the L goes, which aligns quite well with the name as spelled. If you do…
I think we're all aware of that. The post you're responding to essentially made the same point you did, but to someone who thought it appropriate to express their love for realism in a much less mature way.
I was never part of one, but in case nobody with more experience chimes in: I'm assuming the large battles involve a lot of sitting around, pressing the occasional button to change to the next designated target, while…
From the link in my previous post[0]: > False: Select PEP 249-compliant transaction behaviour, implying that sqlite3 ensures a transaction is always open. This means you don't get to control the isolation level of the…
They're probably talking about the addition of the autocommit flag, which hides more fine-grained transaction control in favor of more uniform behavior across multiple databases:…
Trippy!
Chunks of good advice, tossed and blended into a soup of verbiage generated by a helpful LLM. It sounds smooth and resists being read at the same time. I hope we can get to the point where actually good, helpful prose…
The article also addresses why this is not the chosen solution. It's pretty much the first one you'd think of: all kinds of existing software (that can be between client and server and out of their control) already…
Some do: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_Airframe_Parachute_Syst...
I think it's a useful heuristic, but if you apply it too harshly, you'll deprive yourself of interesting perspectives. It's also hard to correct, because you don't get to know how many false positives it produces. So,…
But that's not were the confusion is created. I don't even see the status field on mobile without scrolling. You don't have a missing status field, you have too much confusion, because the field and/or the color have a…
Using only color to communicate the status is confusing. If you want to communicate something, it's often best to just say it. The color can be a visual reinforcement of that. Then your explanation would not be needed.
Gesundheit.
Good luck to you, too.
Okay, I've reflected on our conversation. Please let me try to explain my position. At the end, you'll have my answer to what you wanted me to ask myself. You have your opinion, and you're free to express it. However,…
> You think people pointing out problems in a broken system are the problem. Not what I said, nor does it follow from what I said. Also, not really what you were doing. There's a difference between pointing out…
Well, you could stop undermining what you seem to care for. You don't have to "wrongly imagine" anything. Everyone not doing what's "best for society" is how the world works, authoritarianism and the rule of rich elites…
It's stupidly obvious. Politics is about how we organize government and distribute power to solve the problems of living together as a society of individuals. "Big" vs "small" government is a particular way of…
There's vastly more to politics than that. There's even more to "small" vs "big" government than that, or to who really promises and delivers what. This convenient reduction to handy little words obscures all that, to…
I don't think that "liberal" and "conservative" are empty labels outright. However, they seem to be for the author of the post I was responding to: no substance, just bags to hold reflexive emotions that disguised…
At some point you might realize that you're just thinking about empty labels that you fill with stuff that makes you feel better.
At least not worthwile for the purpose you have in mind. Okay, now I understand better what you mean, something like: for some purposes, there's not much to be gained by distinguishing between "bug" and "feature", one…
When a program clearly deviates from its spec, would you be okay with calling that a "bug"? There's always a gray area of what's intended by the spec, but a program can absolutely and blatantly deviate from the letter…