David Hume is an empiricist. Noam Chomsky is more of rationalist. LessWrong-rationalism is just crackpottery. This brings to mind a review of Stephen Hicks “Explaining Postmodernism”. In the book he contrasts…
Rust/Go really are the Emacs/Vim of programming languages: little in common but commonly mentioned in the same breath.
/wake up, sheeple
That’s a bit aggressive, no?
> Cultivate compassion for those less intelligent than you Also cultivate compassion for the pseudo-rationalism cultists.
I think you should lighten up ;)
Having only one comment on an account and it being about how other people are ornery is the most curmudgeon thing I’ve seen.
The dialog was just saying that I listen to x, y, and z in a snide way. The summary was cool.
At least “this code doesn’t compile” isn’t a potential security vulnerability.
Them: CSS is unintuitive. You: Learning CSS is like taming a wild horse. I think you are in agreement.
del
David Hume is an empiricist. Noam Chomsky is more of rationalist. LessWrong-rationalism is just crackpottery. This brings to mind a review of Stephen Hicks “Explaining Postmodernism”. In the book he contrasts…
Rust/Go really are the Emacs/Vim of programming languages: little in common but commonly mentioned in the same breath.
/wake up, sheeple
That’s a bit aggressive, no?
> Cultivate compassion for those less intelligent than you Also cultivate compassion for the pseudo-rationalism cultists.
I think you should lighten up ;)
Having only one comment on an account and it being about how other people are ornery is the most curmudgeon thing I’ve seen.
The dialog was just saying that I listen to x, y, and z in a snide way. The summary was cool.
At least “this code doesn’t compile” isn’t a potential security vulnerability.
Them: CSS is unintuitive. You: Learning CSS is like taming a wild horse. I think you are in agreement.
del