I agree. More so in that example where the explicit int return type was used. One can certainly argue that the original function name isn't good enough, but I would hate to see "type names" being appended to functions…
Isn't part of this addressed by taking advantage of the new C++ 11 extern template feature? http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#extern-templates
I agree. More so in that example where the explicit int return type was used. One can certainly argue that the original function name isn't good enough, but I would hate to see "type names" being appended to functions…
Isn't part of this addressed by taking advantage of the new C++ 11 extern template feature? http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#extern-templates