wow... aclu is a joke. unconstitutional? sorry but illegal immigrants are not protected by the constitution. why do the democrats fail to understand this?
This comment precisely exemplifies what it's parent describes. One-sided self-righteous talking-point drivel. None of your points in the second sentence are based in reality. NONE. No one was banned by religion, green…
are we bombing indonesia or pakistan? dont think we are
It's very simple, those countries are not actively engaged in exporting terrorism especially pertaining to isil.
Was it made by legal or illegal immigrants? refugee's from Syria? what about non-resident aliens from Yemen? Somalia? Libya? Iran?
who cares about any of this? it will have 0 real world impact on Uber just as the starbucks boycott will have 0 real world impact on starbucks... just more hysteria
reading this right after drinking oats w/tap water...
how is it wrong? is it wrong for a sovereign nation to take care of it's own national interests even if that offends some people? most of what is happening is media-driven hysteria with masses of people that haven't…
1) what does the temporary 90 day ban from 7 countries that export terrorism have to do with Tesla hiring foreign engineers? 2) what does Elon's resume as a legal immigrant have to do with anything? most legal…
> This policy is misguided and evil from the ground up. If this program had been in place twenty years the number of terrorist attacks it would have prevented is zero. So what did you say when Obama temporarily (6…
> This claim is factually incorrect Can you back this statement up with facts?
If you think this will bring LESS needles then you are gravely mistaken. Go take a stroll up to Vancouver to the safe-injection site they are modeling this after and you'll discover destitute conditions in a large…
Thank you for the thoughtful comment. I would say this was predictable if you followed politics closely for the past two years especially as the primaries got underway. It was also predictable if you actually took the…
what's your point? nowhere does that statement mention peaceful, legal, protesting. Rioting, looting, and acts of violence are all illegal.
the numerous polls that showed DJT losing in a "landslide" were shown to be wrong with his historic upsetting win. cnn, huffingtonpost, fivethirtyeight -- amongst many others these mainstream sources clocked Trump's…
1) the only people pissed off are the left/democrats because for the first time in a long time they are not in control. 2) not going to happen. 3) why would he need to run for President to do something he's already done…
So are you implying that by mere virtue of being a successful business person you are disqualified or somehow morally inept in regards to our Presidency? You could make the same arguments that past Presidents could be…
Dual citizenship doesn't really make sense to me... when past generations left Europe for example and came to the US, they had to pledge allegiance to the flag and abandon their foreign citizenship.
Why are dissenting comments on HN displayed with light grey font color? In fact it seems rather odd that comments which seemingly go against the overwhelmingly uniform consensus on this site are highlighted at all.
um aren't you missing "or c) they were actively rioting along with hundreds of others"?
wow... aclu is a joke. unconstitutional? sorry but illegal immigrants are not protected by the constitution. why do the democrats fail to understand this?
This comment precisely exemplifies what it's parent describes. One-sided self-righteous talking-point drivel. None of your points in the second sentence are based in reality. NONE. No one was banned by religion, green…
are we bombing indonesia or pakistan? dont think we are
It's very simple, those countries are not actively engaged in exporting terrorism especially pertaining to isil.
Was it made by legal or illegal immigrants? refugee's from Syria? what about non-resident aliens from Yemen? Somalia? Libya? Iran?
who cares about any of this? it will have 0 real world impact on Uber just as the starbucks boycott will have 0 real world impact on starbucks... just more hysteria
reading this right after drinking oats w/tap water...
how is it wrong? is it wrong for a sovereign nation to take care of it's own national interests even if that offends some people? most of what is happening is media-driven hysteria with masses of people that haven't…
1) what does the temporary 90 day ban from 7 countries that export terrorism have to do with Tesla hiring foreign engineers? 2) what does Elon's resume as a legal immigrant have to do with anything? most legal…
> This policy is misguided and evil from the ground up. If this program had been in place twenty years the number of terrorist attacks it would have prevented is zero. So what did you say when Obama temporarily (6…
> This claim is factually incorrect Can you back this statement up with facts?
If you think this will bring LESS needles then you are gravely mistaken. Go take a stroll up to Vancouver to the safe-injection site they are modeling this after and you'll discover destitute conditions in a large…
Thank you for the thoughtful comment. I would say this was predictable if you followed politics closely for the past two years especially as the primaries got underway. It was also predictable if you actually took the…
what's your point? nowhere does that statement mention peaceful, legal, protesting. Rioting, looting, and acts of violence are all illegal.
the numerous polls that showed DJT losing in a "landslide" were shown to be wrong with his historic upsetting win. cnn, huffingtonpost, fivethirtyeight -- amongst many others these mainstream sources clocked Trump's…
1) the only people pissed off are the left/democrats because for the first time in a long time they are not in control. 2) not going to happen. 3) why would he need to run for President to do something he's already done…
So are you implying that by mere virtue of being a successful business person you are disqualified or somehow morally inept in regards to our Presidency? You could make the same arguments that past Presidents could be…
Dual citizenship doesn't really make sense to me... when past generations left Europe for example and came to the US, they had to pledge allegiance to the flag and abandon their foreign citizenship.
Why are dissenting comments on HN displayed with light grey font color? In fact it seems rather odd that comments which seemingly go against the overwhelmingly uniform consensus on this site are highlighted at all.
um aren't you missing "or c) they were actively rioting along with hundreds of others"?