I'd think about it this way - with LLMs I'm still a human with one brain, one set of hands, one keyboard, one screen. I can delegate more quickly, but still I'm constrained to what I can respond to because I can focus…
I don't know how people are handling constant context switching - ok, I can trigger 5 agents that work on different things. One comes back to me citing a decision I've made 30m ago; then another, citing a finding to…
Now the gatekeeper is saying "I don't want to be a gatekeeper anymore for this one particular gate, because people were mean to me. I'll however continue being gatekeeper for this other gate that drives my business…
Heartbleed
Your harness tells agent to do A when it encounters B. When agent encounters C and it doesnt know what to do it does D and you correct it to do E. Harness keeps track of this and makes agent do E next time it encounters…
That's a very simplistic view. I'm very good at writing tests and I'm happy to offload writing tests to LLMs, as long as they follow the structure I've provided.
no. weather isn't intelligent, it's not alive, yet humans treated it as a god in the past and gave it agency; we understand how it works, yet cannot control it or predict it. but I digress - the main thing: these…
I like this - it reminds me that there are systems (ie weather, economic systems) that are in no way intelligent, but are emergent and react to interactions.
Don't think this is an offensive position and don't think you're telling people what you ought to like; like author you're expressing your opinion
:shocked-pikachu:
It all comes full circle with chinese models being available free for all humanity to use
I think it was more tongue-in-cheek answer. Also it's another narrative Americans are pursuing being the world police.
If you can quantify quality/reliability/understandability, you can tell LLM what kind of code do you expect. If not, you get whatever. At my current place we not only have automated tests, static analysis and static…
Can you quote your sources? The article doesn't mention anything about the regulation you're stating as a fact.
Same here - idk why are people jumping on the wagon of attributing the restriction to EU regulation. Looks to be a US compliance banning social topics that Trump administration is pursuing (but again, idk if that's the…
Where did you get this from? I don't see anything in the article mentioning that specific regulation
ShareYourAISetup folks create a skill that user can run locally that collects information re their setup, formats it and sends to dedicated endpoint. Result = fairly uniform reports where people share what they're…
What even is this shit? Every time I interact with models they do that, or any other variation of "let me make decisions on my own just to get the task done" - are all of this misalignment now? The most egregious to me…
Right, so really any fresh file is more or less fine (would still evaluate cyclomatic complexity). It's the quantity/frequency of changes that matters (or CRAP)
> If the change adds a complex function to an empty file, it's likely just a complex single problem. How do you determine that this is correct = adding complexity to a single file vs adding less complexity to multiple…
That's why I tell my Claude to keep its responses short :V
Then why wouldn't they use a bulletin board that is dead? And according to https://collusion.wiki/ OpenAI did see the results on this board on 21 Jul, so why not make agents delete their traces?
I'm dubious - if the agents were so smart that they've used a message board to coordinate and if they were to do it on other message boards that were not found, then why would this one be found? What makes it so…
Is it just me, or is it advertising? "Look at how smart our models are, they used this website to coordinate and share guidelines!"
I can see porn on x.com without any issues (this is from top of my head regarding widely known websites that show adult content without any checks) On the flipside, I cannot buy any adult orientated games on Steam,…
I'd think about it this way - with LLMs I'm still a human with one brain, one set of hands, one keyboard, one screen. I can delegate more quickly, but still I'm constrained to what I can respond to because I can focus…
I don't know how people are handling constant context switching - ok, I can trigger 5 agents that work on different things. One comes back to me citing a decision I've made 30m ago; then another, citing a finding to…
Now the gatekeeper is saying "I don't want to be a gatekeeper anymore for this one particular gate, because people were mean to me. I'll however continue being gatekeeper for this other gate that drives my business…
Heartbleed
Your harness tells agent to do A when it encounters B. When agent encounters C and it doesnt know what to do it does D and you correct it to do E. Harness keeps track of this and makes agent do E next time it encounters…
That's a very simplistic view. I'm very good at writing tests and I'm happy to offload writing tests to LLMs, as long as they follow the structure I've provided.
no. weather isn't intelligent, it's not alive, yet humans treated it as a god in the past and gave it agency; we understand how it works, yet cannot control it or predict it. but I digress - the main thing: these…
I like this - it reminds me that there are systems (ie weather, economic systems) that are in no way intelligent, but are emergent and react to interactions.
Don't think this is an offensive position and don't think you're telling people what you ought to like; like author you're expressing your opinion
:shocked-pikachu:
It all comes full circle with chinese models being available free for all humanity to use
I think it was more tongue-in-cheek answer. Also it's another narrative Americans are pursuing being the world police.
If you can quantify quality/reliability/understandability, you can tell LLM what kind of code do you expect. If not, you get whatever. At my current place we not only have automated tests, static analysis and static…
Can you quote your sources? The article doesn't mention anything about the regulation you're stating as a fact.
Same here - idk why are people jumping on the wagon of attributing the restriction to EU regulation. Looks to be a US compliance banning social topics that Trump administration is pursuing (but again, idk if that's the…
Where did you get this from? I don't see anything in the article mentioning that specific regulation
ShareYourAISetup folks create a skill that user can run locally that collects information re their setup, formats it and sends to dedicated endpoint. Result = fairly uniform reports where people share what they're…
What even is this shit? Every time I interact with models they do that, or any other variation of "let me make decisions on my own just to get the task done" - are all of this misalignment now? The most egregious to me…
Right, so really any fresh file is more or less fine (would still evaluate cyclomatic complexity). It's the quantity/frequency of changes that matters (or CRAP)
> If the change adds a complex function to an empty file, it's likely just a complex single problem. How do you determine that this is correct = adding complexity to a single file vs adding less complexity to multiple…
That's why I tell my Claude to keep its responses short :V
Then why wouldn't they use a bulletin board that is dead? And according to https://collusion.wiki/ OpenAI did see the results on this board on 21 Jul, so why not make agents delete their traces?
I'm dubious - if the agents were so smart that they've used a message board to coordinate and if they were to do it on other message boards that were not found, then why would this one be found? What makes it so…
Is it just me, or is it advertising? "Look at how smart our models are, they used this website to coordinate and share guidelines!"
I can see porn on x.com without any issues (this is from top of my head regarding widely known websites that show adult content without any checks) On the flipside, I cannot buy any adult orientated games on Steam,…