bootc is a CNCF project now, so anybody can get on board.
Totally. Appliances are perfect candidates for this tech.
Arguably yes. I think the big improvement is that an upgrade is really just switching from image A to image B, rather than dozens to hundreds of individual package transactions. Furthermore parts of the system are fully…
... and it works fabulously. I have been running Bluefin (same folks as Bazzite) from one of these templates for about 6 months and it has been a near on flawless experience. I have moved from Fedora 40->41->42 without…
[flagged]
Flatpak doesn't auto update out of the box on any distro I have used.
I'm all in on bluefin-dx too, and Bluetooth is working fine for me in my lenovo x1 carbon. Fingers crossed you can sort your issue out.
Fair call. In any case I think you'll find things moving towards bootc and away from having to know rpm-ostree at all. The bootc documentation for fedora is pretty good and the Universal Blue project has built some…
Which ABI has red hat broken between minor versions? Can you give some examples that weren't bugs that got fixed?
Alma is based on centos stream. Centos stream is red hat.
But you'll build your business on software you get for free on the internet with absolutely no commitment behind it?
What breaking changes do those upgrades introduce? Is there any compatibility guide?
... And we all know that rolling upgrades frequently introduce breaking changes that don't make sense for enterprise environments. To your (great) point: Customers pay companies like red hat for software stability, both…
Is the problem ultimately to do with your configurations on your centos 7 boxes? Converting to rhel should be easy if you aren't doing anything that red hat wouldn't support in rhel.
CentOS stream is red hat.
We all know it's just made up stuff to feed the narrative of evil IBM making RH evil. Not even the plausible scenario of IBM changing the source code licencing of hashicorp software back to something genuinely open can…
Which alley do you mean?
"Or are they just planning to ship Redhat verbatim and never make their own stuff?" That is their stated mission.
"communist propaganda". Again, another public artifact of you making yourself look like a complete embarrassment. Thanks for sharing.
Your final sentence proves just how little you understand about FOSS. Thanks for making it easy.
Good point. In pure play OSS nobody has come close, for sure. My understanding is that the only other software company that had the same sustained growth trend was salesforce. Could be wrong though.
I spotted that too. By contrast I'd prefer this person shouted it out loud without code so that everybody could see them for who they are.
bootc is a CNCF project now, so anybody can get on board.
Totally. Appliances are perfect candidates for this tech.
Arguably yes. I think the big improvement is that an upgrade is really just switching from image A to image B, rather than dozens to hundreds of individual package transactions. Furthermore parts of the system are fully…
... and it works fabulously. I have been running Bluefin (same folks as Bazzite) from one of these templates for about 6 months and it has been a near on flawless experience. I have moved from Fedora 40->41->42 without…
[flagged]
Flatpak doesn't auto update out of the box on any distro I have used.
I'm all in on bluefin-dx too, and Bluetooth is working fine for me in my lenovo x1 carbon. Fingers crossed you can sort your issue out.
Fair call. In any case I think you'll find things moving towards bootc and away from having to know rpm-ostree at all. The bootc documentation for fedora is pretty good and the Universal Blue project has built some…
Which ABI has red hat broken between minor versions? Can you give some examples that weren't bugs that got fixed?
Alma is based on centos stream. Centos stream is red hat.
But you'll build your business on software you get for free on the internet with absolutely no commitment behind it?
What breaking changes do those upgrades introduce? Is there any compatibility guide?
... And we all know that rolling upgrades frequently introduce breaking changes that don't make sense for enterprise environments. To your (great) point: Customers pay companies like red hat for software stability, both…
Is the problem ultimately to do with your configurations on your centos 7 boxes? Converting to rhel should be easy if you aren't doing anything that red hat wouldn't support in rhel.
CentOS stream is red hat.
We all know it's just made up stuff to feed the narrative of evil IBM making RH evil. Not even the plausible scenario of IBM changing the source code licencing of hashicorp software back to something genuinely open can…
Which alley do you mean?
"Or are they just planning to ship Redhat verbatim and never make their own stuff?" That is their stated mission.
[flagged]
"communist propaganda". Again, another public artifact of you making yourself look like a complete embarrassment. Thanks for sharing.
[flagged]
[flagged]
Your final sentence proves just how little you understand about FOSS. Thanks for making it easy.
Good point. In pure play OSS nobody has come close, for sure. My understanding is that the only other software company that had the same sustained growth trend was salesforce. Could be wrong though.
I spotted that too. By contrast I'd prefer this person shouted it out loud without code so that everybody could see them for who they are.