Could you elaborate on what you mean by "different type of user"? Just curious.
> Firstly, America should strive to not have enemies. We fail at this very badly. This comment is not based in reality. Does Australia have many enemies? Does South Korea? Does Japan? Taiwan?
Age of account is irrelevant, I have been a lurker for a long time. HN used to be a place of civil conversation, not childish and infantile screams.
It is regrettable that Hacker News has devolved into the sort of knee jerk outrage that you find on websites like Reddit.
I certainly do see what you're saying. I think at least 40-60% of what Musk says at any given time is pure sci-fi speculation or hype around an upcoming product/company. I also find it obnoxious how his fanboys and…
>can't understand generics Is this really true? We learned about generics in college so I assumed that everyone knew it (especially if they work at Google).
You need to relax. Yes his comment is speculation, does that mean he is necessarily wrong? He is giving his first-thought analysis of what might be the problem at Signal. Is that such a crime?
Could you elaborate on what you mean by "different type of user"? Just curious.
> Firstly, America should strive to not have enemies. We fail at this very badly. This comment is not based in reality. Does Australia have many enemies? Does South Korea? Does Japan? Taiwan?
Age of account is irrelevant, I have been a lurker for a long time. HN used to be a place of civil conversation, not childish and infantile screams.
It is regrettable that Hacker News has devolved into the sort of knee jerk outrage that you find on websites like Reddit.
I certainly do see what you're saying. I think at least 40-60% of what Musk says at any given time is pure sci-fi speculation or hype around an upcoming product/company. I also find it obnoxious how his fanboys and…
>can't understand generics Is this really true? We learned about generics in college so I assumed that everyone knew it (especially if they work at Google).
You need to relax. Yes his comment is speculation, does that mean he is necessarily wrong? He is giving his first-thought analysis of what might be the problem at Signal. Is that such a crime?