ethan801
No user record in our sample, but ethan801 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but ethan801 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
>If I wasn't generally opposed to an ever-growing scope of federal powers, I'd probably support an effective ban or extremely high bar on new additives. If food companies aren't willing to test it they shouldn't bother…
Well two of the major reasons for the original act were because of highly unsanitary conditions at slaughter houses (Upton Sinclair's The Jungle) and the use of known unsafe preservatives (e.g formaldehyde, spurred on…
I mean it appears the explicit answer is due to the 1938 FDC act. Whereby congress explicitly empowered the FDA to enforce the fact that new drugs must be shown safe before selling and advertising can begin. However no…
My assumption is that when the FDA was created there were already a large number of foods and food additives and testing all of those would have been impossible (and would have struck the public as absurd). You also…
I also often find myself reading the acknowledgments whenever I read a thesis (though I try to save it for the end as a reward for myself). If anyone is interested. At Harvard, most Ph.D programs submit to DASH, meaning…