AI generated "cutest possible animal" (and "make it cuter") might be mildly interesting.
Nuclear war aside (we're talking any kind of decision making here) politicians face very small consequences for harmful decisions, usually at most losing that high-paid job (and getting another high-paid job).
> They have no real world experience. They feel no real world consequences. They have no real stake in any decision they make. Why do you let politicians do any kind of decision making?
> Compilers already do things that “transpilers” are supposed to do. And they do it better because they are built on the foundation of language semantics instead of syntactic manipulation. So you do know the difference.
AI generated "cutest possible animal" (and "make it cuter") might be mildly interesting.
Nuclear war aside (we're talking any kind of decision making here) politicians face very small consequences for harmful decisions, usually at most losing that high-paid job (and getting another high-paid job).
> They have no real world experience. They feel no real world consequences. They have no real stake in any decision they make. Why do you let politicians do any kind of decision making?
> Compilers already do things that “transpilers” are supposed to do. And they do it better because they are built on the foundation of language semantics instead of syntactic manipulation. So you do know the difference.