His whole twitter feed is link bait. And he's deleting all disagreements in the comments on his blog. We have fed the troll.
Again, they didn't "cause" Apple to issue an update alone. The same method for building Find Friends features was used by thousands of social apps, and Path was just a hot target for the media at the time. It was…
Thousands of apps were using the same method for their Find Friends features, and I don't recall any instance where any of those devs were deliberately malicious in their efforts to build better features, or with users'…
Pointing out yet again that you say malicious intent is "unknown," but you claim intentional theft in your article anyway. Libelous.
O crap G+ must be stealing your data too!!! Everybody panic and take my comments as fact!
Which is the core problem with your post. You can't prove malice or even rationalize why they would be malicious, yet you go ahead and post accusations of theft anyway. It's clear libel and defamation, and you deserve…
Clearly this guy doesn't know the legal grounds for libel. You can't throw unfounded accusations of malicious intent around. He deserves to be sued for publishing this BS.
This is a completely irresponsible headline. If loose claims of "theft" like this were directed at my company, I'd sue for libel.
His whole twitter feed is link bait. And he's deleting all disagreements in the comments on his blog. We have fed the troll.
Again, they didn't "cause" Apple to issue an update alone. The same method for building Find Friends features was used by thousands of social apps, and Path was just a hot target for the media at the time. It was…
Thousands of apps were using the same method for their Find Friends features, and I don't recall any instance where any of those devs were deliberately malicious in their efforts to build better features, or with users'…
Pointing out yet again that you say malicious intent is "unknown," but you claim intentional theft in your article anyway. Libelous.
O crap G+ must be stealing your data too!!! Everybody panic and take my comments as fact!
Which is the core problem with your post. You can't prove malice or even rationalize why they would be malicious, yet you go ahead and post accusations of theft anyway. It's clear libel and defamation, and you deserve…
Clearly this guy doesn't know the legal grounds for libel. You can't throw unfounded accusations of malicious intent around. He deserves to be sued for publishing this BS.
This is a completely irresponsible headline. If loose claims of "theft" like this were directed at my company, I'd sue for libel.