> Or, if you do not agree with the new terms, please discontinue using Bountysource. ... and we will keep your money anyway. nice.
i first thought it is by birth/or death date. some relation to "now" might make this more interesting, like the astronomy picture of the day. if there are two on the same day they could simply be shifted.
wtf trust is pilot good English no fake all
if your article is truly timeless, having a date on it will not change that. I automatically rank content without source/time aspect lower than information with a proper context and that includes a date when it was…
here are jacob and jacob on "django minus django": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFRH-oHcbn8 slides: https://speakerdeck.com/jacobian/django-minus-django-djangoc... if you take time to really look into it, it's pretty…
> Or, if you do not agree with the new terms, please discontinue using Bountysource. ... and we will keep your money anyway. nice.
i first thought it is by birth/or death date. some relation to "now" might make this more interesting, like the astronomy picture of the day. if there are two on the same day they could simply be shifted.
wtf trust is pilot good English no fake all
if your article is truly timeless, having a date on it will not change that. I automatically rank content without source/time aspect lower than information with a proper context and that includes a date when it was…
here are jacob and jacob on "django minus django": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFRH-oHcbn8 slides: https://speakerdeck.com/jacobian/django-minus-django-djangoc... if you take time to really look into it, it's pretty…