The flaw in your scheme lies in the fact that "it's simple enough to remember" ... this would imply that if one were to target you they could likely correlate your credentials across multiple leaked PW databases and…
Windows 10 mobile
We will never let redgate forget ;)
Much better for newer features... for async/await dotpeek would show state machine ( which was actually cool to see), but JustDecompile would actually show me async await in decompiled code. ALSO, coolest feature is…
IE11 in compatibility mode does indeed keep the MSIE value... here is mine: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR…
I am rather sure that having so many phones exclusive to ATT is not helping their cause. I would call that sandbagging the numbers to have 1 phone (928), 2 "Nokia Generations" of releases behind on the largest (BY FAR)…
The flaw in your scheme lies in the fact that "it's simple enough to remember" ... this would imply that if one were to target you they could likely correlate your credentials across multiple leaked PW databases and…
Windows 10 mobile
We will never let redgate forget ;)
Much better for newer features... for async/await dotpeek would show state machine ( which was actually cool to see), but JustDecompile would actually show me async await in decompiled code. ALSO, coolest feature is…
IE11 in compatibility mode does indeed keep the MSIE value... here is mine: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR…
I am rather sure that having so many phones exclusive to ATT is not helping their cause. I would call that sandbagging the numbers to have 1 phone (928), 2 "Nokia Generations" of releases behind on the largest (BY FAR)…