There is enough proof that the additional CO2 caused massive greening of the Earth.
Can you explain what caused ice ages? 10K rises and falls in few years?
"_All_ the studies are measuring the same tendency : the temperature is rising" There could be lots of reasons for that. Anyway, the temperatures were not always rising, clear temperatures rise was observed in 1930-40s…
Steady? We have seen 20-years rise after a colder period. Nothing out of order.
CO2 isn't pollution. CO2 is causing massive greening of the earth.
Quite the opposite, actually. Governmental regulations kill innovations.
Nothing can stop the next climate catastrophe. Which is the next ice age by the way, and not some mythical global warming.
Bans like this are unlawful and should be countered by a revolution.
Just look how much gasoline and diesel was sold. Anything else will give you tremendously wrong result.
LOL, no. Denmark used 67.5TWh gasoline and diesel fuel last year, due to better efficiency of the electric drivetrain it's equivalent to roughly 20TWh of electricity. Denmark also used 46TWh electricity last year, so…
Needed for what? Optimal range for plants growth is 1000-1500ppm.
Incredibly dumb move. CO2 is our friend, not an enemy.
End users very consistently hate breaking changes, regardless design or functional.
"If they can do this for ten more quarters there will be less carbon in the atmosphere" - yeah, let our plants starve.
And we would need 730 of such factories to provide all of 73 million annually produced cars with a 200kWh battery.
Honda Insight - 1999 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Insight Toyota Prius - 1997 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Prius
My BMW ran for 107k miles, only repair until now - headlight lamps for $20, self-replaced. BMWs built after 2005 are extremely reliable.
Rather 5 times the normal solar panels.
Bonds can be sold, thus lowering their price and making it harder for Tesla to sell new bonds.
Your numbers are off. Tesla requires 9kg of lithium per 10kWh. If 85kWh model has in reality 95kWh, then you'd need 85kg lithium per car. World reserves of lithium are roughly 16 million tons, so, it would suffices for…
The only reason to switch are moronic German politicians, who require fleet CO2 standard and want to ban ICEs completely.
It's not like he can decide that alone, he has ca. 20% of Tesla's shares.
It's also entirely possible that AfD wins 2021 election, kills all CO2 incentives, after which no new BMW EV model will be built, because they are not competitive on level playing ground.
Battery alone (for 500-miles range) will weight more than double of engine+transmission+gearbox+fuel of 2000-miles range ICE semi.
2200lb for gas, 3000lb for the engine, 700lb for the transmission. Say 7k lb total. Compare this now to the electric one. The battery alone would weight 33k pounds. Engine and transmission would add another 2k. 5 times…
There is enough proof that the additional CO2 caused massive greening of the Earth.
Can you explain what caused ice ages? 10K rises and falls in few years?
"_All_ the studies are measuring the same tendency : the temperature is rising" There could be lots of reasons for that. Anyway, the temperatures were not always rising, clear temperatures rise was observed in 1930-40s…
Steady? We have seen 20-years rise after a colder period. Nothing out of order.
CO2 isn't pollution. CO2 is causing massive greening of the earth.
Quite the opposite, actually. Governmental regulations kill innovations.
Nothing can stop the next climate catastrophe. Which is the next ice age by the way, and not some mythical global warming.
Bans like this are unlawful and should be countered by a revolution.
Just look how much gasoline and diesel was sold. Anything else will give you tremendously wrong result.
LOL, no. Denmark used 67.5TWh gasoline and diesel fuel last year, due to better efficiency of the electric drivetrain it's equivalent to roughly 20TWh of electricity. Denmark also used 46TWh electricity last year, so…
Needed for what? Optimal range for plants growth is 1000-1500ppm.
Incredibly dumb move. CO2 is our friend, not an enemy.
End users very consistently hate breaking changes, regardless design or functional.
"If they can do this for ten more quarters there will be less carbon in the atmosphere" - yeah, let our plants starve.
And we would need 730 of such factories to provide all of 73 million annually produced cars with a 200kWh battery.
Honda Insight - 1999 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Insight Toyota Prius - 1997 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Prius
My BMW ran for 107k miles, only repair until now - headlight lamps for $20, self-replaced. BMWs built after 2005 are extremely reliable.
Rather 5 times the normal solar panels.
Bonds can be sold, thus lowering their price and making it harder for Tesla to sell new bonds.
Your numbers are off. Tesla requires 9kg of lithium per 10kWh. If 85kWh model has in reality 95kWh, then you'd need 85kg lithium per car. World reserves of lithium are roughly 16 million tons, so, it would suffices for…
The only reason to switch are moronic German politicians, who require fleet CO2 standard and want to ban ICEs completely.
It's not like he can decide that alone, he has ca. 20% of Tesla's shares.
It's also entirely possible that AfD wins 2021 election, kills all CO2 incentives, after which no new BMW EV model will be built, because they are not competitive on level playing ground.
Battery alone (for 500-miles range) will weight more than double of engine+transmission+gearbox+fuel of 2000-miles range ICE semi.
2200lb for gas, 3000lb for the engine, 700lb for the transmission. Say 7k lb total. Compare this now to the electric one. The battery alone would weight 33k pounds. Engine and transmission would add another 2k. 5 times…