to put it in other words, I'd readily assume a currency couldn't be stable if it wasn't serving its intended purpose, being representative of economic state.
> things you buy became too expensive or too cheap. > if the currency remains stable > you could still buy the same amount of most things in other countries not affected by the war Sure I can, sure, but whether or not…
We rather say the economy is stable, then. If most things go awry after a war, that's not because of the currency and nobody will care about the currency either ... except for traders crossing borders and exchanging…
No, it isn't.
to put it in other words, I'd readily assume a currency couldn't be stable if it wasn't serving its intended purpose, being representative of economic state.
> things you buy became too expensive or too cheap. > if the currency remains stable > you could still buy the same amount of most things in other countries not affected by the war Sure I can, sure, but whether or not…
We rather say the economy is stable, then. If most things go awry after a war, that's not because of the currency and nobody will care about the currency either ... except for traders crossing borders and exchanging…
No, it isn't.