Would he realistically be able to make as much as they make out of him by himself? While working the same amount? It's debatable whether he would even make as much as he gets paid currently, in that scenario.
Technically no, but you can distribute software, especially for free, that happens to break copy protection for one or more valid reasons, according to the law. And, more importantly, we certainly don't try to limit the…
Aren't able to or have just failed to do so? Regardless, that doesn't exempt them from the responsibility. It's ultimately software they're running on their own machine, there is no one else to responsibilize for it. I…
A much less sizable part thinks it's okay to limit local computing. There isn't a widespread push to make it so local hardware is limited in ways that they're not allowed to, for instance, run programs that can hack…
When it's an open weight, locally run blackbox, you blame the user, since in that case it's very much possible for the user to restrict what the blackbox can actually do. They have full control over it, so it follows…
Yet we don't regulate computers so that they're rendered incapable of running software that can be used to hack into systems. Or said software, by the way. All we do is punish the people who use these tools to cause…
How do you think LLMs work? Because you seem to think they're a big compressed folder of every content they were trained upon, thus a big permanent copyright violation. You're probably also capable of reproducting some…
That already didn't happen, regardless of AI. The thing about freely sharing knowledge is that people take that knowledge and use it to build further knowledge that helps you. You might say that the fact LLMs are being…
When you objected to quotes around the term you deliberately used to make them sound better than regular updates that any early access game gets.
Then don't complain because people disagree. If adding unnecessary qualifiers to make it sound better is fair, so is quoting them.
Always having some instance of someone messing up is still substantially different from more instances than not being messed up. So it did actually matter quite a lot. Now, as someone who is an avid retro gamer, I play…
Many people bought it expecting more, because the studio promised a lot more. You can say that's on the people for not checking before buying, but that doesn't invalidate the dishonesty on their part. Were it an early…
Back in the day, they had to ship complete working games, because the cost to fix it later was too high. Not that they wouldn't mess up all the time, but the punishment for messing up was severe. And paid expansions…
Content updates for a paid game aren't free. They're adding to a package that, more often than not, was incomplete to begin with. And they'll often result in more sales, which is how they pay for themselves. Not that…
Won't that effectively leak the user's registered age bracket anyway? And if so, what advantage does it has over the current law?
That's exactly what the law will do, but on the device. The parents will input the child's age during device setup, and then every service will query the age range based on that and work in "child account" mode. Without…
That's a very shallow understanding of reading, especially coming from an author. No, reading is not just about getting the idea from the author. It's an experience in and of itself, and the lack of something makes the…
We still do that, though, within our own little tribes inside civilization. Most people still love their grandparents, even though they're old. That just doesn't necessarily extend to all of civilization.
We don't need to have every human care about every single other human to thrive as a species. If anything, if we did, we wouldn't be able to thrive at all. The issues you mentioned are, in the vast majority of cases,…
> Humans, by virtue of being living, thinking beings deserve lives of fulfillment, dignity, and security. You wanting people to have that doesn't mean that people deserve to have that. Fundamentally, no one deserves…
> The person who did the work deserved credit and compensation. That's the part of the argument in favor of copyright that is inherently flawed. Doing some amount of work doesn't entitle you to anything besides whatever…
Would he realistically be able to make as much as they make out of him by himself? While working the same amount? It's debatable whether he would even make as much as he gets paid currently, in that scenario.
Technically no, but you can distribute software, especially for free, that happens to break copy protection for one or more valid reasons, according to the law. And, more importantly, we certainly don't try to limit the…
Aren't able to or have just failed to do so? Regardless, that doesn't exempt them from the responsibility. It's ultimately software they're running on their own machine, there is no one else to responsibilize for it. I…
A much less sizable part thinks it's okay to limit local computing. There isn't a widespread push to make it so local hardware is limited in ways that they're not allowed to, for instance, run programs that can hack…
When it's an open weight, locally run blackbox, you blame the user, since in that case it's very much possible for the user to restrict what the blackbox can actually do. They have full control over it, so it follows…
Yet we don't regulate computers so that they're rendered incapable of running software that can be used to hack into systems. Or said software, by the way. All we do is punish the people who use these tools to cause…
How do you think LLMs work? Because you seem to think they're a big compressed folder of every content they were trained upon, thus a big permanent copyright violation. You're probably also capable of reproducting some…
That already didn't happen, regardless of AI. The thing about freely sharing knowledge is that people take that knowledge and use it to build further knowledge that helps you. You might say that the fact LLMs are being…
When you objected to quotes around the term you deliberately used to make them sound better than regular updates that any early access game gets.
Then don't complain because people disagree. If adding unnecessary qualifiers to make it sound better is fair, so is quoting them.
Always having some instance of someone messing up is still substantially different from more instances than not being messed up. So it did actually matter quite a lot. Now, as someone who is an avid retro gamer, I play…
Many people bought it expecting more, because the studio promised a lot more. You can say that's on the people for not checking before buying, but that doesn't invalidate the dishonesty on their part. Were it an early…
Back in the day, they had to ship complete working games, because the cost to fix it later was too high. Not that they wouldn't mess up all the time, but the punishment for messing up was severe. And paid expansions…
Content updates for a paid game aren't free. They're adding to a package that, more often than not, was incomplete to begin with. And they'll often result in more sales, which is how they pay for themselves. Not that…
Won't that effectively leak the user's registered age bracket anyway? And if so, what advantage does it has over the current law?
That's exactly what the law will do, but on the device. The parents will input the child's age during device setup, and then every service will query the age range based on that and work in "child account" mode. Without…
That's a very shallow understanding of reading, especially coming from an author. No, reading is not just about getting the idea from the author. It's an experience in and of itself, and the lack of something makes the…
We still do that, though, within our own little tribes inside civilization. Most people still love their grandparents, even though they're old. That just doesn't necessarily extend to all of civilization.
We don't need to have every human care about every single other human to thrive as a species. If anything, if we did, we wouldn't be able to thrive at all. The issues you mentioned are, in the vast majority of cases,…
> Humans, by virtue of being living, thinking beings deserve lives of fulfillment, dignity, and security. You wanting people to have that doesn't mean that people deserve to have that. Fundamentally, no one deserves…
> The person who did the work deserved credit and compensation. That's the part of the argument in favor of copyright that is inherently flawed. Doing some amount of work doesn't entitle you to anything besides whatever…