Like I have stated elsewhere, the US gov. only cares about accountability towards itself, not towards others. If OpenAI decides to "accidentally" reveal state secrets to foreign agents, the US will come after them.
Sorry for my rudeness earlier. But I'm emphasizing that the accountability that US gov. cares (specially with this prez) is only OpenAI towards the US gov. They don't care about it towards others.
Are you going to make an argument or just spout thought terminating cliches? Do you really think OpenAI, for instance, would be able to cross the current administration without any serious consequences?
We are talking about a ban on Chinese AI on federal agencies. The concern isn't about the general citizen data, but private federal information and secrets, some of which could pertain to critical IT infrastructure.…
Personally, I agree. Still, it's not surprising that the government is choosing the safer option to itself. On itself, it's quite reasonable. I believe most people complaining about this decision are really just have…
Indeed, but Chinese AI model companiea are harder to held accountable by the US than US companies, so there's some sense for the US to prefer national models over international ones.
Technically, there's a risk of abliteratted model leaking data to external third party: https://projectdiscovery.io/research/how-abliterated-models-...
What I think they are trying to tell you is that there isn't a single sanctioned way of doing modern accelerated rendering. One could argue there was when GPUs were less flexible and had a fixed pipeline, but modern day…
Are we doubting the levels of stupidity in US's current administration?
The RIAA is indeed quite bad, regardless of Musk. They only exist to further make of copyright a dystopian nightmare. I guess some people love DRM and further losing control over our owned devices.
*sucks for the rest of the body. I'm sure the cancer itself is pretty "happy".
Internet Archive's traffic may not matter to you, but that's the main topic of this discussion, regardless of what you care or use website archival tools for.
Given that the root of the discussion is about Internet Archive being hit with huge traffic and not the functionalities provided by Wayback Machine, it very much is a distinction with a difference.
Accusations of fascism are rarely made in good faith either. As I pointed out in response to @undeveloped, Merrian-Webster's definition doesn't seem applicable to DHH.
As far as I can tell, the only thing DHH has that is consistent with this definition is racism/nationalism, but: 1. He hasn't spoused actual collectivist beliefs, like "nothing out of the state, everything within the…
We, as in the terminally online, have known that AI can generate imperceptibly fake footage. There are still plenty of average people who still gets caught off guard.
I'll take a wild guess and say that's how ultrasound diagnostics work
I'd say that only really strengthens OP's overall point of being about using "the wrong language for the wrong thing".
Technically, the criteria for open source is freedom to freely distribute and modify the source code, not to upstream changes. That's a different for thing. https://opensource.org/osd
Out of curiosity, may I ask why?
Given the nature of the US legal system as based on common law, that applies beyond patents, and may affect ARM and x86 as well. In the end, the real, effective law is the one understood by judges, adjucated in court…
"it's impossible to prove a negative" is a simplification. A negation is just the oppositive of an affirmation. If the affirmation is "there is an element E of an infinite set S that satisfies property P", the negation…
Both of your post are actual ad hominem towards OP. In the first, you just said they didn't know how software is developed, without elaborating. With this in mind, their reply is less of an ad hominem and more of an…
> Of course not because that's impossible to prove. Why?
> Because nobody will write software for 300 unique hardware variations Who said they have to? One can select a RISC-V configuration for a baseline for a particular purpose. Desktop? Choose the one that's most powerful.…
Like I have stated elsewhere, the US gov. only cares about accountability towards itself, not towards others. If OpenAI decides to "accidentally" reveal state secrets to foreign agents, the US will come after them.
Sorry for my rudeness earlier. But I'm emphasizing that the accountability that US gov. cares (specially with this prez) is only OpenAI towards the US gov. They don't care about it towards others.
Are you going to make an argument or just spout thought terminating cliches? Do you really think OpenAI, for instance, would be able to cross the current administration without any serious consequences?
We are talking about a ban on Chinese AI on federal agencies. The concern isn't about the general citizen data, but private federal information and secrets, some of which could pertain to critical IT infrastructure.…
Personally, I agree. Still, it's not surprising that the government is choosing the safer option to itself. On itself, it's quite reasonable. I believe most people complaining about this decision are really just have…
Indeed, but Chinese AI model companiea are harder to held accountable by the US than US companies, so there's some sense for the US to prefer national models over international ones.
Technically, there's a risk of abliteratted model leaking data to external third party: https://projectdiscovery.io/research/how-abliterated-models-...
What I think they are trying to tell you is that there isn't a single sanctioned way of doing modern accelerated rendering. One could argue there was when GPUs were less flexible and had a fixed pipeline, but modern day…
Are we doubting the levels of stupidity in US's current administration?
The RIAA is indeed quite bad, regardless of Musk. They only exist to further make of copyright a dystopian nightmare. I guess some people love DRM and further losing control over our owned devices.
*sucks for the rest of the body. I'm sure the cancer itself is pretty "happy".
Internet Archive's traffic may not matter to you, but that's the main topic of this discussion, regardless of what you care or use website archival tools for.
Given that the root of the discussion is about Internet Archive being hit with huge traffic and not the functionalities provided by Wayback Machine, it very much is a distinction with a difference.
Accusations of fascism are rarely made in good faith either. As I pointed out in response to @undeveloped, Merrian-Webster's definition doesn't seem applicable to DHH.
As far as I can tell, the only thing DHH has that is consistent with this definition is racism/nationalism, but: 1. He hasn't spoused actual collectivist beliefs, like "nothing out of the state, everything within the…
We, as in the terminally online, have known that AI can generate imperceptibly fake footage. There are still plenty of average people who still gets caught off guard.
I'll take a wild guess and say that's how ultrasound diagnostics work
I'd say that only really strengthens OP's overall point of being about using "the wrong language for the wrong thing".
Technically, the criteria for open source is freedom to freely distribute and modify the source code, not to upstream changes. That's a different for thing. https://opensource.org/osd
Out of curiosity, may I ask why?
Given the nature of the US legal system as based on common law, that applies beyond patents, and may affect ARM and x86 as well. In the end, the real, effective law is the one understood by judges, adjucated in court…
"it's impossible to prove a negative" is a simplification. A negation is just the oppositive of an affirmation. If the affirmation is "there is an element E of an infinite set S that satisfies property P", the negation…
Both of your post are actual ad hominem towards OP. In the first, you just said they didn't know how software is developed, without elaborating. With this in mind, their reply is less of an ad hominem and more of an…
> Of course not because that's impossible to prove. Why?
> Because nobody will write software for 300 unique hardware variations Who said they have to? One can select a RISC-V configuration for a baseline for a particular purpose. Desktop? Choose the one that's most powerful.…