One more fix... if you have group names with spaces this will throw the field number off and you'll see the modification time preceding the mark name. Adding '-n' to the ls command works around this by causing the group…
I think for impact there should be one grand winner each year. Otherwise there will soon be too many to count I'm afraid. Maybe also an award for most silly password policy?
Would like to see some notion of how long data is retained. Period of time, til account deletion, forever, etc. I agree with 'broken by design' in many cases, but first step is at least having a non-broken design.
One more fix... if you have group names with spaces this will throw the field number off and you'll see the modification time preceding the mark name. Adding '-n' to the ls command works around this by causing the group…
I think for impact there should be one grand winner each year. Otherwise there will soon be too many to count I'm afraid. Maybe also an award for most silly password policy?
Would like to see some notion of how long data is retained. Period of time, til account deletion, forever, etc. I agree with 'broken by design' in many cases, but first step is at least having a non-broken design.