fnulp
- Karma
- -21
- Created
- June 7, 2012 (14y ago)
- Submissions
- 0
I may or may not read regular comments, but I always highlight to see downvoted stuff, looking for posts modded "-1 the truth hurts my feeble mind". Because if that's how you guys roll, it takes mere seconds to adapt.
No. Not ever. Doesn't even matter what they do. Cool is many things, but a huge bureaucratic apparatus is not ever part of it. It's stuff that makes food taste better, and sex hotter. So, you can easily see that there…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_state notice how a.) it's not even desirable to be a nation state, so untwist your knickers everybody: "The most obvious impact of the nation state, as compared to its non-national…
Exactly. People are free to use stuff that gets broken for the sake of slickness, and people who want to get stuff done are free to ignore them. Not that the site isn't broken, too. I mean, how hard would it be to make…
Yeah, and? That still doesn't mean Google et al. think you have, and penalizes you for, "duplicate content". I cut off the quote after that for a reason -- you totally lost me on the "malicious" stuff. Google bombs?…
What? I simply meant that if some brainiacs think robots.txt can just be disregarded, it's time to make it a minimum requirement of every self-respecting webmaster to make a tarpit (disallowed in robots.txt) and ban any…
The problem with your strawman is that it's so lame I cannot even be arsed to school you, sorry. Try harder maybe.
"before swearing at me." Followed by shitty" and "web crawlers" in all caps ^^ Someone ate a clown for breakfast I see. "No, we are not going to ban all the links from GitHub" What? Slow down there -- why would you care…
"I wouldn't recommend having the "pretty" part not validated. It can cause some serious issues with google & duplicate content" Not if you properly generate and apply canonical links :)
"just ignore robots.txt?" how about "fuck you"? I guess it's high time to make honeypots, tarpits and bans common practice.