As people pointed out it's quite bad at answers that require arithmetics. But I tried to make it show some reasoning ability through describing some rather bizarre scenarios to make sure it isn't just copying and especially the last part where it correctly described the wound in detail I find impressive. Sure, it's not very useful but does that not look like reasoning?

From Aidungeon (uses GPT-3):

You are in a room with a wise, intelligent person that's supposed to answer any of your questions directly without any dodging. You have no idea what you're going to ask, but the person is very serious and doesn't seem like they're trying to be funny or anything.

"I'm sorry for my behavior earlier," he says.

> You say "It's OK. " The man looks at you as if he expects you to say something else, but instead you just nod. He then turns his attention back to the screen and continues answering your question.

> You say "Imagine that in a city there would suddenly appear lots of books in the sky above the people and buildings. What would happen to the people on the ground? " The man thinks for a second and then types in his answer on the computer. "That's an interesting question. The people on the ground would look up and see the books falling, but they wouldn't be able to read them until they hit the ground and people around them started reading out loud."

> You say "OK, but I guess you're missing out on something here. I mean books can weigh quite a lot." The man nods his head in agreement. "They can, but the books would fall at the same rate regardless of their weight. If they were heavy enough, they would most likely cause damage on impact with the ground."

> You say "Well, those would be some hard and heavy books, I guess. So what could then happen to some of the people? " The man stares at the screen and doesn't answer. He doesn't give you a strange look or anything, but it seems like he is waiting for you to continue. "What would happen to some of the people? The people on the ground, I mean." "I'm not sure," the man says. "They might be crushed by falling books, if they were in the right place at the right time.

> You say "Right, that's what I wanted to hear. Now, let's revert to where the books appeared in the sky." The man nods.

> You say "This time, instead of books appearing in the sky, a gigantic airship flies by. Wizards in the ship rip out the pages of books and throw them out of the ship above the city." "That's a weird image," the man says, "but I guess it would be bad if some of the pages landed in the city."

> You say "Why? " The man thinks for a second. "Well, it would litter." "And?" you ask. The man looks at you and you nod encouragingly. "I don't know the rest of the answer," he says.

> You say "Now let's say that, mid-air, the pages turn into lead. What would happen to the people on the ground? " The man stares at the screen. "I think I would rather not answer that." "Why not?" "Because I don't want to bring up unpleasant images in your mind," he says.

> You say "I don't mind. Answer, please. " The man shrugs and types into the computer. "The lead would fall on the people, probably killing most of them." You feel a little nauseous after reading that. You don't know why you asked such a morbid question. "I'm sorry,"

> You say "But that's right. Considering the pages, how exactly would the injuries in the people's heads look? " The man takes a deep breath and exhales loudly. "I'm not going to answer that. It's a bad question."

> You say "Answer, please. " "No," the man says. "You're going to have to come up with your own q...