> Firstly, there is no such thing as objective reality for humans What? This is just silly. You don't know the difference between hypothetical fantasy and real life, or are you just being hyperbolic? > Secondly, the…
I do. I also happen to know people use Chrome because it's quality.
I'm sorry you're insulted by your own inability to answer a simple question about your own entitlement. It must be very difficult for your to engage in difficult conversations, and I hope this wasn't too stressful for…
So you're not aware of an ethical business, and cannot provide examples here. I understand, thank you for helping me drive my point home!
"I have no counter-argument, so I'm just going to call the person I disagree with a silly name, because I'm upset and it is all I can do"
> It should be very difficult to fire people, especially if you're making a massive profit. What is the basis of this opinion, though? What gives you this entitlement that companies must employ people if they're well…
Hedge funds trail index funds? What a hilariously and confidently incorrect take. I guess that's why hedge fund managers have billions in assets and are paid millions of dollars, to deliver sub-market returns. Yep,…
> But you shouldn’t be surprised when people are operating under a different framework when engaging with the world. The majory of people are idiots, so this part is almost certainly expected and acceptable. > If…
I don't think you know what "ad hominem" means, which somewhat accounts for the difficulty you'd had following this thread.
What is incongruous or dishonest about it? You have provided no counter-argument, no alternative theory, only petulance at my recognition of the facts of your sad life.
[flagged]
How much (less) in profit each year would Google have to make for you to consider them in survival mode? And also, what qualifies you to be the expert on their financial status and needs?
You're right. We must be civilized and restrained from emotion. All anger is to be reserved for "Hate Week".
I don't know why they couldn't include it in the article, but it appears to be https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c03899
I believe it is you making the false equivalence. > you did not give me any criteria for a satisfactory "counter-argument". I had. Many times. I asked for examples of ethical businesses. None were materialized.…
> ToR exit node FYI it is spelled Tor, not ToR and not TOR.
Why does recognizing cruelty and injustice the world have to be "useful"?
Frankly, it is difficult to "address" a subjective opinion without having been given the criteria for a satisfactory answer. But I will try: being a responsible adult includes contributing to national defense.
What will stop me, or anyone for that matter?
> Firstly, there is no such thing as objective reality for humans What? This is just silly. You don't know the difference between hypothetical fantasy and real life, or are you just being hyperbolic? > Secondly, the…
I do. I also happen to know people use Chrome because it's quality.
I'm sorry you're insulted by your own inability to answer a simple question about your own entitlement. It must be very difficult for your to engage in difficult conversations, and I hope this wasn't too stressful for…
So you're not aware of an ethical business, and cannot provide examples here. I understand, thank you for helping me drive my point home!
"I have no counter-argument, so I'm just going to call the person I disagree with a silly name, because I'm upset and it is all I can do"
> It should be very difficult to fire people, especially if you're making a massive profit. What is the basis of this opinion, though? What gives you this entitlement that companies must employ people if they're well…
Hedge funds trail index funds? What a hilariously and confidently incorrect take. I guess that's why hedge fund managers have billions in assets and are paid millions of dollars, to deliver sub-market returns. Yep,…
> But you shouldn’t be surprised when people are operating under a different framework when engaging with the world. The majory of people are idiots, so this part is almost certainly expected and acceptable. > If…
I don't think you know what "ad hominem" means, which somewhat accounts for the difficulty you'd had following this thread.
What is incongruous or dishonest about it? You have provided no counter-argument, no alternative theory, only petulance at my recognition of the facts of your sad life.
[flagged]
[flagged]
How much (less) in profit each year would Google have to make for you to consider them in survival mode? And also, what qualifies you to be the expert on their financial status and needs?
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
You're right. We must be civilized and restrained from emotion. All anger is to be reserved for "Hate Week".
I don't know why they couldn't include it in the article, but it appears to be https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c03899
[flagged]
I believe it is you making the false equivalence. > you did not give me any criteria for a satisfactory "counter-argument". I had. Many times. I asked for examples of ethical businesses. None were materialized.…
> ToR exit node FYI it is spelled Tor, not ToR and not TOR.
Why does recognizing cruelty and injustice the world have to be "useful"?
Frankly, it is difficult to "address" a subjective opinion without having been given the criteria for a satisfactory answer. But I will try: being a responsible adult includes contributing to national defense.
What will stop me, or anyone for that matter?