Even better: you can fork the exeuntu image & make it immediately more relevant to the things you do in addition to just dropping in your programs and such.
I’m shocked I had to scroll this far to find the first sensible reply.
You might be interested to learn I am primarily doing proofs & formal methods. I have a couple of novel formalizations using some bolt-on programs I wrote for Claude Code, but I am mainly using it now to build my eval…
This is truly vindication for my efforts to get off of frontier models and harnesses as much as possible. I won't deny the model is _pretty good_ but it is not worth all of this whiplash.
"Fable extended until 26 July" obviously.
Sounds like a perfect fit for a minimal or bespoke harness?
How is this on the front page with 3 points and no comments?! Also, what is this?
In my harness, I implemented tool_edit as a subset of Rob Pike’s Sam editor syntax [0]. Only need ~650 tokens of system prompt for it to work. It’s pretty stellar. [0] https://9p.io/sys/doc/sam/sam.html
Anyone else feel as if HN is healing? I hope this isn't the walking-ghost era of HN.
I rarely click on things like this, but this was brilliant; I enjoyed it. Thanks for sharing.
I’d be curious what performance / behavior changes you’d observe with two changes: - planner nodes and topo deepest for rescheduling, no inflight modifications. (repair protocol = redispatch root planner for rare cases…
I rolled my own simple execution DAG program. It’s shockingly effective due to rooting sub-DAGs into Planner nodes which are the only mutators of the DAG. The deepest topological leaf nodes become the blockers to the…
I still use Opus 4.6 (with later models for subagents only sometimes), but I have been preparing for it to go away.
Not "local" in the literal sense, but I set it up to serve at half quant for $23/hr and full quant for $35/hr. You don't need to have it always on? This is a far cry from "$200/month," but I do not think it's $50k for…
I’ve been falling back to Opus 4.6 since 4.7 and 4.8. I recently found success in using Opus 4.6 for cheap orchestration and reasoning while Opus 4.8 High/Max agents do the work. I made serious progress towards…
I would love to know how many countless others on HN, like me, find themselves reading about a very they have built and have been using for months talked about like it’s a revolutionary new idea.
I rolled the same thing in Go months ago as I am sure at least another 1000 people have in their own way.
> Schmidt, who served in various capacities as CEO, Chairman, and technical advisor to Google and its parent company Alphabet across several decades, ... It is gratuitous to say “several,” no?…
I’ll admit it swings back and forth on a six month cycle or so; however, cost-to-output matters. Also, for niche use-cases there are clear winners.
You’re absolutely kidding yourself if you genuinely believe that.
Why content like this doesn’t supersede the AI content, I will never know. Thanks for sharing :)
Precisely; Go is by no means perfect, but if you want to throw away its security efforts, by all means use goblin.run I’ll take vibe shooting myself in the foot over lying to myself any day.
I cannot fathom why anyone would want this.
SPY is an ETF and SPX is an index. The distinction is material. /ES does not trade between 5pm and 6pm ET. SPX options aren't marked until 8:15 PM ET. It's more plausible that large caps see MWF, then MTWHF possibly.
It would appear that person and OP are one in the same.
Even better: you can fork the exeuntu image & make it immediately more relevant to the things you do in addition to just dropping in your programs and such.
I’m shocked I had to scroll this far to find the first sensible reply.
You might be interested to learn I am primarily doing proofs & formal methods. I have a couple of novel formalizations using some bolt-on programs I wrote for Claude Code, but I am mainly using it now to build my eval…
This is truly vindication for my efforts to get off of frontier models and harnesses as much as possible. I won't deny the model is _pretty good_ but it is not worth all of this whiplash.
"Fable extended until 26 July" obviously.
Sounds like a perfect fit for a minimal or bespoke harness?
How is this on the front page with 3 points and no comments?! Also, what is this?
In my harness, I implemented tool_edit as a subset of Rob Pike’s Sam editor syntax [0]. Only need ~650 tokens of system prompt for it to work. It’s pretty stellar. [0] https://9p.io/sys/doc/sam/sam.html
Anyone else feel as if HN is healing? I hope this isn't the walking-ghost era of HN.
I rarely click on things like this, but this was brilliant; I enjoyed it. Thanks for sharing.
I’d be curious what performance / behavior changes you’d observe with two changes: - planner nodes and topo deepest for rescheduling, no inflight modifications. (repair protocol = redispatch root planner for rare cases…
I rolled my own simple execution DAG program. It’s shockingly effective due to rooting sub-DAGs into Planner nodes which are the only mutators of the DAG. The deepest topological leaf nodes become the blockers to the…
I still use Opus 4.6 (with later models for subagents only sometimes), but I have been preparing for it to go away.
Not "local" in the literal sense, but I set it up to serve at half quant for $23/hr and full quant for $35/hr. You don't need to have it always on? This is a far cry from "$200/month," but I do not think it's $50k for…
I’ve been falling back to Opus 4.6 since 4.7 and 4.8. I recently found success in using Opus 4.6 for cheap orchestration and reasoning while Opus 4.8 High/Max agents do the work. I made serious progress towards…
I would love to know how many countless others on HN, like me, find themselves reading about a very they have built and have been using for months talked about like it’s a revolutionary new idea.
I rolled the same thing in Go months ago as I am sure at least another 1000 people have in their own way.
> Schmidt, who served in various capacities as CEO, Chairman, and technical advisor to Google and its parent company Alphabet across several decades, ... It is gratuitous to say “several,” no?…
I’ll admit it swings back and forth on a six month cycle or so; however, cost-to-output matters. Also, for niche use-cases there are clear winners.
You’re absolutely kidding yourself if you genuinely believe that.
Why content like this doesn’t supersede the AI content, I will never know. Thanks for sharing :)
Precisely; Go is by no means perfect, but if you want to throw away its security efforts, by all means use goblin.run I’ll take vibe shooting myself in the foot over lying to myself any day.
I cannot fathom why anyone would want this.
SPY is an ETF and SPX is an index. The distinction is material. /ES does not trade between 5pm and 6pm ET. SPX options aren't marked until 8:15 PM ET. It's more plausible that large caps see MWF, then MTWHF possibly.
It would appear that person and OP are one in the same.