Oh yeah, no murderers, just a system that makes them...
Look at the world around. Look at the train crash.
Huge assumptions there
Harvey has significantly more than "safety checks like this repo does" and if you don't realize that, you genuinely have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. >I see law firms as having no clue on how things…
Well the firms with engineering teams are most definitely exploring doing it all in-house. There is no point in having the engineering team otherwise. I'm at a midsize firm that doesn't have that kind of staff and we're…
That's because current AI models are incapable of doing knowledge workers' jobs. At least for me as an attorney, Harvey is only actually useful when it comes to helping me sort through large amounts of data. Even then,…
Harvey can be pretty useful and has all sorts of tailoring done to it to provide utility to legal professionals. I don't really see any of that here. Like someone else pointed out, the main benefit of Harvey is being…
I'll be sure to, thanks.
Ah, assuming.
That his views on the antichrist shouldn't be taken seriously. Not sure why you're pretending there is more to it than that very obvious point.
I don't think so
Not hosting a defectively designed product doesn't obviate the liability of selling a product that is defectively designed. The liability is for designing and selling a dangerous product, not for hosting it.
So at worst the Chinese models would do what the US models already do??
> It cannot be taken seriously unfortunately. What, like his views on the antichrist?
>The judge assigned penalties below the statutory maximum, but maximums are rarely assigned and both the number of counts and ultimate number the judge came up with are all dubious. The jury found the violations were…
So Meta shouldn't face the statutory penalty for the laws it broke? It's already received a 10x reduction in verdict.
It's really besides the point because what the other poster linked was articles about reducing jury damages verdicts. These were not jury-imposed damages and none of the bases that apply to reducing jury damage verdicts…
Crazy that you'd read my comment and think I was saying there was "not correlation." It's like pointing out that a software company has a lot of people that studied software engineering.
The jury found liability. That's not the same thing as a jury making a damages determination on an amount. The judge imposed the penalty in accordance with the statute, and then went further and gave it a huge discount…
Yeah, the jury found liability. They didn't render the verdict. The judge did, at a huge discount from the statutory rate. Not sure what you think you're adding to this discussion.
It's not a jury verdict. Crazy how much that needs to be repeated in this thread.
It's not a jury verdict, and I am a lawyer... Also, a paper from RAND from 1987? Are you for real?
No one is stopping them. There's no requirement that you be a lawyer. And lol, what a crazy idea... a lawmaker studying lawyering?! What a scam!
They are also not punitive damages, and Meta was also found to be willful.
What are the grounds for the appeal? How does NM law look on that issue? It's a significantly reduced judgment too. Like, yeah, you have a point in the abstract, but barring any actual supportive facts, it doesn't seem…
Oh yeah, no murderers, just a system that makes them...
Look at the world around. Look at the train crash.
Huge assumptions there
Harvey has significantly more than "safety checks like this repo does" and if you don't realize that, you genuinely have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. >I see law firms as having no clue on how things…
Well the firms with engineering teams are most definitely exploring doing it all in-house. There is no point in having the engineering team otherwise. I'm at a midsize firm that doesn't have that kind of staff and we're…
That's because current AI models are incapable of doing knowledge workers' jobs. At least for me as an attorney, Harvey is only actually useful when it comes to helping me sort through large amounts of data. Even then,…
Harvey can be pretty useful and has all sorts of tailoring done to it to provide utility to legal professionals. I don't really see any of that here. Like someone else pointed out, the main benefit of Harvey is being…
I'll be sure to, thanks.
Ah, assuming.
That his views on the antichrist shouldn't be taken seriously. Not sure why you're pretending there is more to it than that very obvious point.
I don't think so
Not hosting a defectively designed product doesn't obviate the liability of selling a product that is defectively designed. The liability is for designing and selling a dangerous product, not for hosting it.
So at worst the Chinese models would do what the US models already do??
> It cannot be taken seriously unfortunately. What, like his views on the antichrist?
>The judge assigned penalties below the statutory maximum, but maximums are rarely assigned and both the number of counts and ultimate number the judge came up with are all dubious. The jury found the violations were…
So Meta shouldn't face the statutory penalty for the laws it broke? It's already received a 10x reduction in verdict.
It's really besides the point because what the other poster linked was articles about reducing jury damages verdicts. These were not jury-imposed damages and none of the bases that apply to reducing jury damage verdicts…
Crazy that you'd read my comment and think I was saying there was "not correlation." It's like pointing out that a software company has a lot of people that studied software engineering.
The jury found liability. That's not the same thing as a jury making a damages determination on an amount. The judge imposed the penalty in accordance with the statute, and then went further and gave it a huge discount…
Yeah, the jury found liability. They didn't render the verdict. The judge did, at a huge discount from the statutory rate. Not sure what you think you're adding to this discussion.
It's not a jury verdict. Crazy how much that needs to be repeated in this thread.
It's not a jury verdict, and I am a lawyer... Also, a paper from RAND from 1987? Are you for real?
No one is stopping them. There's no requirement that you be a lawyer. And lol, what a crazy idea... a lawmaker studying lawyering?! What a scam!
They are also not punitive damages, and Meta was also found to be willful.
What are the grounds for the appeal? How does NM law look on that issue? It's a significantly reduced judgment too. Like, yeah, you have a point in the abstract, but barring any actual supportive facts, it doesn't seem…