you dont need 256 codepoints so you can neatly represent an octet (whatever that is), you just need 2 bits. you can just stack as many diacritical marks you want on any glyph. either the renderer allows practically…
competing with what? your score doesnt vary based on others. i came here to laugh at this thread.. no different than calculators and google both of which were misused in the same way. and then people who are "worried"…
> terminals are fast their slow as hell and incredibly inefficient to build graphics on top of > but many are powered by the same graphics technologies used in video games what does that mean? obviously they have to…
you dont need 256 codepoints so you can neatly represent an octet (whatever that is), you just need 2 bits. you can just stack as many diacritical marks you want on any glyph. either the renderer allows practically…
competing with what? your score doesnt vary based on others. i came here to laugh at this thread.. no different than calculators and google both of which were misused in the same way. and then people who are "worried"…
> terminals are fast their slow as hell and incredibly inefficient to build graphics on top of > but many are powered by the same graphics technologies used in video games what does that mean? obviously they have to…