Stability - I'm not sure that any of the current lua port drivers are terribly robust. Even if they were, it's easier to reason about the behaviour of Erlang code than native code within the VM.
Your interpretation of my original comment seems extremely hypersensitive to me. Perhaps there is cultural difference at play here. The experience I've had in hosting ten-thousand odd zones suggests that these resolvers…
I don't see how you could construe my comment as being in anyway impolite. Google does not turn up any useful results for this subject. The only reference I've seen to resolvers doing something unusual with caching is…
The negative cache time is defined by the SOA minimum field. Forward cache times are defined at the RR set level.
Please prove this assertion by posting the address of a resolver that behaves as you describe.
I really fail to see how this is user error. That isn't what the parent comment said.
Your knowledge may be obscuring the bigger picture here. I suspect the general public wouldn't behave the way you would - the only spill I've ever seen resulted in the user turning the machine over and furiously shaking…
Stability - I'm not sure that any of the current lua port drivers are terribly robust. Even if they were, it's easier to reason about the behaviour of Erlang code than native code within the VM.
Your interpretation of my original comment seems extremely hypersensitive to me. Perhaps there is cultural difference at play here. The experience I've had in hosting ten-thousand odd zones suggests that these resolvers…
I don't see how you could construe my comment as being in anyway impolite. Google does not turn up any useful results for this subject. The only reference I've seen to resolvers doing something unusual with caching is…
The negative cache time is defined by the SOA minimum field. Forward cache times are defined at the RR set level.
Please prove this assertion by posting the address of a resolver that behaves as you describe.
I really fail to see how this is user error. That isn't what the parent comment said.
Your knowledge may be obscuring the bigger picture here. I suspect the general public wouldn't behave the way you would - the only spill I've ever seen resulted in the user turning the machine over and furiously shaking…