Do you want to rely on a phone that’s missing a random moving selection of critical features and bricks itself on every update?
Or, you know, man-in-the-middle because that was already a correct, perfectly clear use of English.
I can't see why; it's a goofy 20th-century colloquialism popularized by Bugs Bunny cartoons as a substitute "damn". I sincerely doubt the original author meant anything else.
I work in formal verification, at a FANG, with three decades of experience. In a day, I throw a few thousands of dollars worth of tokens at the SOTA models and have them produce tens of thousands of lines of code…
What’s the bad news, exactly?
It's an objective fact. I'm sitting here watching astra do in a day what would have taken me at least 3-6 months. The code is verified correct. The model finds, reads, understands, and then integrates the latest…
"If it works, ship it" is very different from "If it works, and I understand it because I wrote it, ship it". Does the LLM understand it, in detail? Can you trust its interpretation of the information and instructions…
The basic, broad usability barriers that prevent adoption by (or increase adoption costs for) many users today -- OS features, application support, hardware drivers, etc -- which has historically been far too much work…
The CVEs are going to be epic.
It is, but an already niche operating system that refuses to leverage the advantages of LLMs is only going to fall further and further behind. I say that as someone who has actively contributed to the BSDs since the 90s…
If you stick to POSIX, things generally work everywhere. It's not really a question of what is better, just what is portable.
> The dog also briefly went in the house (which I think is poor form, to be clear). Extremely poor form. Dog people seem to struggle with accepting these kinds of boundaries around their dogs for reasons I’ve never…
In your imagined future, how do you imagine the AI would build, grow, improve, and operate its physical substrate independently of human intervention?
We’re talking about far-left (in this case) radicalization that needs to be stamped out, and which directly feeds the reactionary right. I don’t give a shit about their cause. They lost me and anyone else that’s…
No, terrorism is defined by their methods and targets. I wish I could say I was shocked by the dangerous radicalization you’re exhibiting, but it’s increasingly the norm.
We’re talking about a petrol bomb hurled at someone’s home.
More accurate would be “rioter”, “terrorist”, or “insurrectionist”, depending on the specifics.
It’s fantastic way to engender popular support for AI. People hate those groups’ protestors — and for good reason.
> only about one percent of welfare recipients are young men
I’d prefer that Anthropic and the EA cult types have less thoughts about AI.
Did you have the stickers handmade by a traditional letterpress shop, or did you put printers out of work by relying on digital printing? … and don’t vandalize other people’s work just because you think it might be…
Wait till you hear about the rational arguments for eugenics based on metrics of moral worth. We’ve been here before, many, many times.
I grew up in a cult, too. They were very eager and sincere. I'm very familiar with "eager and sincere" hiding incoherent motivated reasoning and savior complexes that give their adherents cover to behave both stupidly…
A voice activated gun? Really? I couldn’t come up with an argument as tortured and ridiculous as yours if I tried.
Okay? That’s a non-sequitur. Yes, alignment is important. No, alignment is not perfect. And at the end of the day guns don’t kill people, but models could. Do I think it’s likely? No. Do I think AI doomerism is a joke?…
Do you want to rely on a phone that’s missing a random moving selection of critical features and bricks itself on every update?
Or, you know, man-in-the-middle because that was already a correct, perfectly clear use of English.
I can't see why; it's a goofy 20th-century colloquialism popularized by Bugs Bunny cartoons as a substitute "damn". I sincerely doubt the original author meant anything else.
I work in formal verification, at a FANG, with three decades of experience. In a day, I throw a few thousands of dollars worth of tokens at the SOTA models and have them produce tens of thousands of lines of code…
What’s the bad news, exactly?
It's an objective fact. I'm sitting here watching astra do in a day what would have taken me at least 3-6 months. The code is verified correct. The model finds, reads, understands, and then integrates the latest…
"If it works, ship it" is very different from "If it works, and I understand it because I wrote it, ship it". Does the LLM understand it, in detail? Can you trust its interpretation of the information and instructions…
The basic, broad usability barriers that prevent adoption by (or increase adoption costs for) many users today -- OS features, application support, hardware drivers, etc -- which has historically been far too much work…
The CVEs are going to be epic.
It is, but an already niche operating system that refuses to leverage the advantages of LLMs is only going to fall further and further behind. I say that as someone who has actively contributed to the BSDs since the 90s…
If you stick to POSIX, things generally work everywhere. It's not really a question of what is better, just what is portable.
> The dog also briefly went in the house (which I think is poor form, to be clear). Extremely poor form. Dog people seem to struggle with accepting these kinds of boundaries around their dogs for reasons I’ve never…
In your imagined future, how do you imagine the AI would build, grow, improve, and operate its physical substrate independently of human intervention?
We’re talking about far-left (in this case) radicalization that needs to be stamped out, and which directly feeds the reactionary right. I don’t give a shit about their cause. They lost me and anyone else that’s…
No, terrorism is defined by their methods and targets. I wish I could say I was shocked by the dangerous radicalization you’re exhibiting, but it’s increasingly the norm.
We’re talking about a petrol bomb hurled at someone’s home.
More accurate would be “rioter”, “terrorist”, or “insurrectionist”, depending on the specifics.
It’s fantastic way to engender popular support for AI. People hate those groups’ protestors — and for good reason.
> only about one percent of welfare recipients are young men
I’d prefer that Anthropic and the EA cult types have less thoughts about AI.
Did you have the stickers handmade by a traditional letterpress shop, or did you put printers out of work by relying on digital printing? … and don’t vandalize other people’s work just because you think it might be…
Wait till you hear about the rational arguments for eugenics based on metrics of moral worth. We’ve been here before, many, many times.
I grew up in a cult, too. They were very eager and sincere. I'm very familiar with "eager and sincere" hiding incoherent motivated reasoning and savior complexes that give their adherents cover to behave both stupidly…
A voice activated gun? Really? I couldn’t come up with an argument as tortured and ridiculous as yours if I tried.
Okay? That’s a non-sequitur. Yes, alignment is important. No, alignment is not perfect. And at the end of the day guns don’t kill people, but models could. Do I think it’s likely? No. Do I think AI doomerism is a joke?…