> Are they more in number and easier to use than the Arduino libraries? It's not either/or, beyond what's in the native SDK RP2 boards also benefit from the Arduino ecosystem via the excellent and well maintained…
It's because it's accessed via SPI PSRAM rather than the on-die SRAM on offer for the 128Kb.
Modern remixes of legacy microelectronics like this are a hobby I'm particularly fond of. I'm sure I'm not alone in having assembled far too many Z80, 6809 and 6502 and of course 8088 projects than is probably healthy…
I've been watching this project like a hawk for months to see whether the final DMA/FDC bugs they identified get ironed out. The idea of being able to hand-assemble a 386DX SBC, ISA backplane and Alexandru's other ISA…
Is it? Surely this simply and proportionately deals with exactly the risks above?
I don't think I've seen anyone suggest that there is absolutely no impact on transmission. Teenagers were previously a population in which the virus could freely circulate where now there's at least some limited…
As I understand it, precisely because they may then pass the infection on to those who may then end up with a severe illness (either because they're unvaccinated or because their protection is waning).
It's CTC vetting rather than DV, significantly less costly to undertake.
> Are they more in number and easier to use than the Arduino libraries? It's not either/or, beyond what's in the native SDK RP2 boards also benefit from the Arduino ecosystem via the excellent and well maintained…
It's because it's accessed via SPI PSRAM rather than the on-die SRAM on offer for the 128Kb.
Modern remixes of legacy microelectronics like this are a hobby I'm particularly fond of. I'm sure I'm not alone in having assembled far too many Z80, 6809 and 6502 and of course 8088 projects than is probably healthy…
I've been watching this project like a hawk for months to see whether the final DMA/FDC bugs they identified get ironed out. The idea of being able to hand-assemble a 386DX SBC, ISA backplane and Alexandru's other ISA…
Is it? Surely this simply and proportionately deals with exactly the risks above?
I don't think I've seen anyone suggest that there is absolutely no impact on transmission. Teenagers were previously a population in which the virus could freely circulate where now there's at least some limited…
As I understand it, precisely because they may then pass the infection on to those who may then end up with a severe illness (either because they're unvaccinated or because their protection is waning).
It's CTC vetting rather than DV, significantly less costly to undertake.