You're confusing the economic effects of inflation and deflation with environments of low and high real interest rates. I'd counter by saying that the strongest decades of median real wage growth and general GDP growth…
In terms of numbers, your logic is slightly off because of the distortions of tax law, which means in fact, the bulk of the S&P's distributions in any given year are often buybacks. It makes the net yield of the S&P500…
This process of cutting out traditional retail banks destroys liquidity, which the central bank knows it would probably have to offset through either becoming an explicit uncollateralised lender to banks or other…
Spamfilter prior to HashCash based on Proof of Income
If 140% of the market cap is sold short, it means the longs own 280% of the market cap - that makes no 'sense' either.
the standard (as a regulated person) is intention - you don't even have to succeed at moving the price in order to be guilty of market abuse/manipulation
You're confusing the economic effects of inflation and deflation with environments of low and high real interest rates. I'd counter by saying that the strongest decades of median real wage growth and general GDP growth…
In terms of numbers, your logic is slightly off because of the distortions of tax law, which means in fact, the bulk of the S&P's distributions in any given year are often buybacks. It makes the net yield of the S&P500…
This process of cutting out traditional retail banks destroys liquidity, which the central bank knows it would probably have to offset through either becoming an explicit uncollateralised lender to banks or other…
Spamfilter prior to HashCash based on Proof of Income
If 140% of the market cap is sold short, it means the longs own 280% of the market cap - that makes no 'sense' either.
the standard (as a regulated person) is intention - you don't even have to succeed at moving the price in order to be guilty of market abuse/manipulation