gov owned companies excuse for existing is the acceptance of the benefits to society if such enterprises controls the monopoly. you don't expect the water and power dept leaving out a neighborhood just so the free…
this is so obvious, yet there are several highly voted comments here insanely comparing uber to amazon. I sense a strong astroturfing to bump uber here.
how much it raised against only matter to figure out how much the VC will pay for the shares. by your numbers, it appear that uber convinced investors to pay $30b for 24% of the company. which now, might only be worth…
why invest in a network if you can just buy computers. what an idiotic article.
gov owned companies excuse for existing is the acceptance of the benefits to society if such enterprises controls the monopoly. you don't expect the water and power dept leaving out a neighborhood just so the free…
this is so obvious, yet there are several highly voted comments here insanely comparing uber to amazon. I sense a strong astroturfing to bump uber here.
how much it raised against only matter to figure out how much the VC will pay for the shares. by your numbers, it appear that uber convinced investors to pay $30b for 24% of the company. which now, might only be worth…
why invest in a network if you can just buy computers. what an idiotic article.