My point is that selling encryption software as "secure" is a difficult position, since nobody can really guarantee the security, even with open source code. Therefore the decision to choose a particular "secure"…
Good question. I don't know. Personally, a company that (1) works on secure encryption and (2) advertises "100% pure Swiss" is a negative signal.
1. Only the client apps are open source, not the server side. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underhanded_C_Contest
from Threema own homepage: "100% Swiss Made" "Threema is a true Swiss company hosting its own servers in Switzerland." After Omnisec AG and Crypto AG, how is anyone falling for that cliché again...
My point is that selling encryption software as "secure" is a difficult position, since nobody can really guarantee the security, even with open source code. Therefore the decision to choose a particular "secure"…
Good question. I don't know. Personally, a company that (1) works on secure encryption and (2) advertises "100% pure Swiss" is a negative signal.
1. Only the client apps are open source, not the server side. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underhanded_C_Contest
from Threema own homepage: "100% Swiss Made" "Threema is a true Swiss company hosting its own servers in Switzerland." After Omnisec AG and Crypto AG, how is anyone falling for that cliché again...