You're wrong, and you need to get off your high horse. People use "LISP" when referring to the general family of LISP-like languages. And people that do this tend to know about Common Lisp. That's why they do this.
There is nothing difficult about writing an s-expression parser. None of the plethora of Scheme interpreters out there get parsing wrong. Handling dotted pairs is rather trivial compared to, say, getting hygienic macros…
You're wrong, and you need to get off your high horse. People use "LISP" when referring to the general family of LISP-like languages. And people that do this tend to know about Common Lisp. That's why they do this.
There is nothing difficult about writing an s-expression parser. None of the plethora of Scheme interpreters out there get parsing wrong. Handling dotted pairs is rather trivial compared to, say, getting hygienic macros…