Or perhaps just because it's not accurate. Reducing any complex system down to a trivial projection is very unlikely to explain anything well.
Look up "perlis epigrams lisp" for the context here. :)
Ostrom's results didn't disprove ToC. She showed that common resources can be communally maintained, not that tragic outcomes could never happen.
"Going Postal" was brilliant. GNU Terry Pratchett.
That's a fair question, but I didn't have another person read it. (If I'm being honest, I think my colleagues would have looked at me funny. We don't exactly have a culture of using TLA+ to describe sysadmin processes…
I think this was more of a press release than an edict. The Purdue announcement says, "Built on recently launched AI majors, minors and certificates across colleges, and following the establishment of a working group…
Delegated to the provost and deans. Who else would you expect to hold accountable for developing a graduate attribute?
I've had the same intuition. I've had mixed results in this area, although I'm certainly no expert. Recently I wanted to formalize a model of a runbook for a tricky system migration, to help me reason through some…
That's pretty impressive -- thanks for sharing the link.
Very well expressed. That's great early-career guidance, but also a good refresher for many senior staff.
I've often taken inspiration from RFC 2418, "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures" [1], a rare RFC that defines a human protocol ("rough consensus") rather than a technical one. [1]…
(also, velociraptors)
Arguably the European churches were such an industry for centuries, and were highly effective at it.
It gives a cue about how many times I've probably seen the article before. Quite useful, IMO. I read this particular article when it came out in 2006... it's convenient to know we're not discussing a novel finding on…
> we are free only as much as we don't have guns in our face telling us we're not. Is this actually an old saying?
Nice article!
> What very few SF writers understood "Understood?" They were writing fiction, not instruction manuals.
He can say what he wants, but he literally inlined the entirety of HTML into the syntax. It's delusional to suggest that this design choice emphasizes readability above all else.
My laconic question was downvoted. Sorry, I was on my phone, but didn't want to forget about this. I'm sincerely interested in reading the source of this research. Searching for it now, I came across this article:…
It's fine if the poster above me wishes to change languages. Anyone who chooses to stick with Haskell should get comfortable with the notion that functions can diverge, and accept that this is fully consistent with the…
Reference, please?
It sounds cool but also like a remarkable level of scope creep for the JVM. I realize that Java ecosystem is far beyond simple these days. Nobody is spinning up a JVM implementation as a hobby project. But sad to see…
> in the sense that their return type doesn't fully describe what the code does Sure they do, at least in Haskell. Bottom inhabits all types.
I think some of the confusion is because you're referring to the type variables as parameters. Parameters and type variables are not the same thing. A is a type variable, X is a parameter in your example.
Yes, although the New York Public Library has had you covered since the 1960's: https://qz.com/732086/the-new-york-public-librarys-little-kn...
Or perhaps just because it's not accurate. Reducing any complex system down to a trivial projection is very unlikely to explain anything well.
Look up "perlis epigrams lisp" for the context here. :)
Ostrom's results didn't disprove ToC. She showed that common resources can be communally maintained, not that tragic outcomes could never happen.
"Going Postal" was brilliant. GNU Terry Pratchett.
That's a fair question, but I didn't have another person read it. (If I'm being honest, I think my colleagues would have looked at me funny. We don't exactly have a culture of using TLA+ to describe sysadmin processes…
I think this was more of a press release than an edict. The Purdue announcement says, "Built on recently launched AI majors, minors and certificates across colleges, and following the establishment of a working group…
Delegated to the provost and deans. Who else would you expect to hold accountable for developing a graduate attribute?
I've had the same intuition. I've had mixed results in this area, although I'm certainly no expert. Recently I wanted to formalize a model of a runbook for a tricky system migration, to help me reason through some…
That's pretty impressive -- thanks for sharing the link.
Very well expressed. That's great early-career guidance, but also a good refresher for many senior staff.
I've often taken inspiration from RFC 2418, "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures" [1], a rare RFC that defines a human protocol ("rough consensus") rather than a technical one. [1]…
(also, velociraptors)
Arguably the European churches were such an industry for centuries, and were highly effective at it.
It gives a cue about how many times I've probably seen the article before. Quite useful, IMO. I read this particular article when it came out in 2006... it's convenient to know we're not discussing a novel finding on…
> we are free only as much as we don't have guns in our face telling us we're not. Is this actually an old saying?
Nice article!
> What very few SF writers understood "Understood?" They were writing fiction, not instruction manuals.
He can say what he wants, but he literally inlined the entirety of HTML into the syntax. It's delusional to suggest that this design choice emphasizes readability above all else.
My laconic question was downvoted. Sorry, I was on my phone, but didn't want to forget about this. I'm sincerely interested in reading the source of this research. Searching for it now, I came across this article:…
It's fine if the poster above me wishes to change languages. Anyone who chooses to stick with Haskell should get comfortable with the notion that functions can diverge, and accept that this is fully consistent with the…
Reference, please?
It sounds cool but also like a remarkable level of scope creep for the JVM. I realize that Java ecosystem is far beyond simple these days. Nobody is spinning up a JVM implementation as a hobby project. But sad to see…
> in the sense that their return type doesn't fully describe what the code does Sure they do, at least in Haskell. Bottom inhabits all types.
I think some of the confusion is because you're referring to the type variables as parameters. Parameters and type variables are not the same thing. A is a type variable, X is a parameter in your example.
Yes, although the New York Public Library has had you covered since the 1960's: https://qz.com/732086/the-new-york-public-librarys-little-kn...