i also wonder about this concept; is there a programming language that has this behavior?
if only people knew how easy it is to implement the standard library and make it way simpler than what is usually provided, everyone would be writing their own standard libraries; you can implement one with string…
if you depend on more, you are capping what you can build to only what you can manage to get working and integrate, plus you also lose control over the code; for me personally, it's a lot easier to write a complicated…
package.json is a convention, not a language definition, hence package managers may implement "package" management differently; in reality conventions are followed, until they aren't, and that's where hell begins (if…
i also wonder about this concept; is there a programming language that has this behavior?
if only people knew how easy it is to implement the standard library and make it way simpler than what is usually provided, everyone would be writing their own standard libraries; you can implement one with string…
if you depend on more, you are capping what you can build to only what you can manage to get working and integrate, plus you also lose control over the code; for me personally, it's a lot easier to write a complicated…
package.json is a convention, not a language definition, hence package managers may implement "package" management differently; in reality conventions are followed, until they aren't, and that's where hell begins (if…