That's great, but, not the subject of this post. We're not discussing the theory of whether new chemicals are good or bad. I agree with you that the general consensus is to overly fear man made chemicals, which is wrong…
What's the point here? Is this not common sense? Too much of anything is bad. Why bring complicated subjects radioactivity to this point when all you need to do is use the example of water, ie: you can die from…
Thank you for the link. > Most significant, he [Obama] failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin,…
That's great, but, not the subject of this post. We're not discussing the theory of whether new chemicals are good or bad. I agree with you that the general consensus is to overly fear man made chemicals, which is wrong…
What's the point here? Is this not common sense? Too much of anything is bad. Why bring complicated subjects radioactivity to this point when all you need to do is use the example of water, ie: you can die from…
Thank you for the link. > Most significant, he [Obama] failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin,…