Better to keep tasks in a separate repo imo, or at least make sure they aren't committed. I always follow one rule: looking at the git history should tell me what each change did, and the commit message alone should be…
Nope, you're breaking Git history with that. You should think about what your history represents. Just move the task manager somewhere else and track it there.
[flagged]
Yeap
Better to keep tasks in a separate repo imo, or at least make sure they aren't committed. I always follow one rule: looking at the git history should tell me what each change did, and the commit message alone should be…
Nope, you're breaking Git history with that. You should think about what your history represents. Just move the task manager somewhere else and track it there.
[flagged]
Yeap