Why are you trying to convince me?
Great. Sour grapes is when you assume that a privilege another person has must actually be bad. In this case the temptation is to say you could be successful in big tech but you are too moral. (Other people must be…
> only highest volume sellers can remain. Ridiculous simplification. Well, remind me not to hire you for an executive media position.
This is also the default C behavior.
Nothing they could have done? That’s crazy. Before video this happened to text. Look at for example how NYT has shored itself up vs the many failed news outlets. Premium brand.
Have you read this document?
How does internet censorship 2016-2024 fit into your model? It’s more simple than that. Industry tends to align with government because they have power and they want that power to be benefit them. If you’re a large…
[dead]
I'm baffled. Do you not see the normative vs descriptive claim here? The reality is that requiring benefits imposes a cost, and employers manage that cost by limiting who qualifies. So yes, descriptively this…
You're missing the point of the comment. It was not about affordability.
Sour grapes. > sit through endless woke sexual harassment videos where you are taught that the white man is the source of all evil, In big tech I had fewer trainings than any other org in my career, because they knew…
It's always helpful to have more credentials and more prestige. Does that stop the other 80% of hires? No.
This is a form of sour grapes.
I don't think this is true. Good implementation is secret sauce, and not re-producible for external observation alone. I'm even aware of software techniques which only exist within companies, despite much public effort…
> and no undefined behavior Where is the behavior specified?
I'm a pretty big AI skeptic, but can't get behind this comment. It is changing the economy. It is changing how work is done. We are not going back, even if the emphasis in the workplace and role it performs matures.
which is in unintended but predictable side effect of requiring those benefits for full-time employees.
Modern technology makes distribution free, so then you need to compete on brand and quality. Outsourcing seems extremely short-sighted in this environment. You're devaluing your brand, and giving expertise and training…
The headline is misleading. He hasn’t been commenting about the Goose language and his experience with it. And you are promoting.
Why are you pretending that John is endorsing your project?
He didn’t comment on goose. He talked about a concept and the goose guy said “that’s like my idea”. And John said “yeah sounds like it”.
All these names are silly. It's just marketing.
Hire an empathetic engineer and don’t have the write code.
Yep, LLMs work to the degree you don’t care shout the choices made. That’s why it’s great for demos and starter templates. But for mature software eventually every single detail matters.
I don’t think work training turns you into someone who thinks logically about systems and about human psychology.
Why are you trying to convince me?
Great. Sour grapes is when you assume that a privilege another person has must actually be bad. In this case the temptation is to say you could be successful in big tech but you are too moral. (Other people must be…
> only highest volume sellers can remain. Ridiculous simplification. Well, remind me not to hire you for an executive media position.
This is also the default C behavior.
Nothing they could have done? That’s crazy. Before video this happened to text. Look at for example how NYT has shored itself up vs the many failed news outlets. Premium brand.
Have you read this document?
How does internet censorship 2016-2024 fit into your model? It’s more simple than that. Industry tends to align with government because they have power and they want that power to be benefit them. If you’re a large…
[dead]
I'm baffled. Do you not see the normative vs descriptive claim here? The reality is that requiring benefits imposes a cost, and employers manage that cost by limiting who qualifies. So yes, descriptively this…
You're missing the point of the comment. It was not about affordability.
Sour grapes. > sit through endless woke sexual harassment videos where you are taught that the white man is the source of all evil, In big tech I had fewer trainings than any other org in my career, because they knew…
It's always helpful to have more credentials and more prestige. Does that stop the other 80% of hires? No.
This is a form of sour grapes.
I don't think this is true. Good implementation is secret sauce, and not re-producible for external observation alone. I'm even aware of software techniques which only exist within companies, despite much public effort…
> and no undefined behavior Where is the behavior specified?
I'm a pretty big AI skeptic, but can't get behind this comment. It is changing the economy. It is changing how work is done. We are not going back, even if the emphasis in the workplace and role it performs matures.
which is in unintended but predictable side effect of requiring those benefits for full-time employees.
Modern technology makes distribution free, so then you need to compete on brand and quality. Outsourcing seems extremely short-sighted in this environment. You're devaluing your brand, and giving expertise and training…
The headline is misleading. He hasn’t been commenting about the Goose language and his experience with it. And you are promoting.
Why are you pretending that John is endorsing your project?
He didn’t comment on goose. He talked about a concept and the goose guy said “that’s like my idea”. And John said “yeah sounds like it”.
All these names are silly. It's just marketing.
Hire an empathetic engineer and don’t have the write code.
Yep, LLMs work to the degree you don’t care shout the choices made. That’s why it’s great for demos and starter templates. But for mature software eventually every single detail matters.
I don’t think work training turns you into someone who thinks logically about systems and about human psychology.