If they become rare, wouldn't the market supply more cabs? I mean, how do you think food supply works?
So any small business or startup without name recognition should be restricted from the marketplace by a higher authority until a government entity approves its service? Is that what you're saying? Wouldn't this…
So you're basically saying that mutually consenting adults shouldn't be able to choose their own taxi arrangements, correct? Comparing this to food safety is quite ludicrous. You can sell apples without an "apple…
This doesn't make any sense. Subsidized cabs can coexist with the likes of Uber/Lyft. Do you think subsidized apartments don't exist or something?
Then choose a different taxi from Uber/Lyft. Why impose these rules if mutually consenting adults want to engage in a transaction between each other?
If they become rare, wouldn't the market supply more cabs? I mean, how do you think food supply works?
So any small business or startup without name recognition should be restricted from the marketplace by a higher authority until a government entity approves its service? Is that what you're saying? Wouldn't this…
So you're basically saying that mutually consenting adults shouldn't be able to choose their own taxi arrangements, correct? Comparing this to food safety is quite ludicrous. You can sell apples without an "apple…
This doesn't make any sense. Subsidized cabs can coexist with the likes of Uber/Lyft. Do you think subsidized apartments don't exist or something?
Then choose a different taxi from Uber/Lyft. Why impose these rules if mutually consenting adults want to engage in a transaction between each other?