I do not believe that you went through my comment history in the few minutes that it took for you to respond to me. Also, something that I did not mention before > ...but that your views are considered problematic by…
> and having randos holding knives knocking on people's windows Are you referring to some specific event?
4chan is not only /pol/. The culture between boards is vastly different. Although I do not disagree, /pol/ specifically is toxic. And it's not as if reddit does not have its own share of similar forums.
Yes? I thought that you did not assume good faith from me. I did not think that you were not acting in good faith.
People on 4chan will call you slurs and insults but it is never personal, part of it is due to the anonymous nature. People here will be personally vicious and hostile. > ...but that your views are considered…
Huh? I am not talking about twitch. If anything this just shows that you disagree with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28771025 which is the post that I am replying to.
Not really, I would go as far as to argue that it is less toxic than reddit, twitter, and even HN.
What about competition? Or well, not acting evil.
> Sure, but this fragmentation isn't exactly new. There have always been multiple toolkits on Linux I think that we got a little bit sidetracked. "I want my users to be able to be able to select what borders to have" ->…
> It does, the user can choose to use GTK or Qt apps. That's... not what I meant by it. I find this dangerous as it encourages duplicate work for minor differences. I would rather not have to make both a GTK and a Qt…
There have been various in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141154, first one in 2011 I believe. There are a few more not mentioned there, such as https://github.com/Dudemanguy/gtk and…
> I don't want that when I'm making apps. If I'm making a GTK app then I would expect to get the GTK borders. If I'm making a Qt app then I would expect to get the Qt borders. And so on. Surely the choice should fall on…
Patches for it have been submitted but they were never merged. Some users even patch gtk themselves.
People were actually annoyed when they replaced the normal search with the new recursive one, so I doubt it.
> No one in the thread could post one so far. This is false, I posted this before: > Just look at all these people who went to jail for crimes related to illegal numbers (eg. piracy). Or people like Mildred Gillars. Or…
These are not really corner cases but whatever man, you believe what you want.
Mind you, tor had basically the same issue a while ago https://archive.is/4FMxm
No, rather, it asks from you to assume good faith from me.
> In the US, an idea can't be a "terrorist organization". In Germany, it can be This is false.
> If you voluntarily agree to not leak secrets and do so anyway its not protected under free speech Of course it is. Anyway, I mentioned more cases where there is no voluntarily agreement. > You also dont get jailed for…
> that is not in good faith I did not say that. I am sure that CRConrad is acting in good faith. > but you are fine with Yes, I explained why I said it in the post that you are replying to. My biggest mistake was using…
I think that this is extremely simplistic. For example it does not account for individualist anarchism or the collectivist "for our country/nation/race" pushed by various fascist governments.
This also seems to be bi-partisan sadly.
No need to be so hostile and toxic. I only mentioned it because this is an actual argument against TLS that I have seen being used in the past, even by popular sites such as pornhub for example (before being forced to…
I showed that this is incorrect here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28587930 > You go to jail because what you said is actually a crime to say Sounds like the US. Just look at all these people who went to jail…
I do not believe that you went through my comment history in the few minutes that it took for you to respond to me. Also, something that I did not mention before > ...but that your views are considered problematic by…
> and having randos holding knives knocking on people's windows Are you referring to some specific event?
4chan is not only /pol/. The culture between boards is vastly different. Although I do not disagree, /pol/ specifically is toxic. And it's not as if reddit does not have its own share of similar forums.
Yes? I thought that you did not assume good faith from me. I did not think that you were not acting in good faith.
People on 4chan will call you slurs and insults but it is never personal, part of it is due to the anonymous nature. People here will be personally vicious and hostile. > ...but that your views are considered…
Huh? I am not talking about twitch. If anything this just shows that you disagree with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28771025 which is the post that I am replying to.
Not really, I would go as far as to argue that it is less toxic than reddit, twitter, and even HN.
What about competition? Or well, not acting evil.
> Sure, but this fragmentation isn't exactly new. There have always been multiple toolkits on Linux I think that we got a little bit sidetracked. "I want my users to be able to be able to select what borders to have" ->…
> It does, the user can choose to use GTK or Qt apps. That's... not what I meant by it. I find this dangerous as it encourages duplicate work for minor differences. I would rather not have to make both a GTK and a Qt…
There have been various in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141154, first one in 2011 I believe. There are a few more not mentioned there, such as https://github.com/Dudemanguy/gtk and…
> I don't want that when I'm making apps. If I'm making a GTK app then I would expect to get the GTK borders. If I'm making a Qt app then I would expect to get the Qt borders. And so on. Surely the choice should fall on…
Patches for it have been submitted but they were never merged. Some users even patch gtk themselves.
People were actually annoyed when they replaced the normal search with the new recursive one, so I doubt it.
> No one in the thread could post one so far. This is false, I posted this before: > Just look at all these people who went to jail for crimes related to illegal numbers (eg. piracy). Or people like Mildred Gillars. Or…
These are not really corner cases but whatever man, you believe what you want.
Mind you, tor had basically the same issue a while ago https://archive.is/4FMxm
No, rather, it asks from you to assume good faith from me.
> In the US, an idea can't be a "terrorist organization". In Germany, it can be This is false.
> If you voluntarily agree to not leak secrets and do so anyway its not protected under free speech Of course it is. Anyway, I mentioned more cases where there is no voluntarily agreement. > You also dont get jailed for…
> that is not in good faith I did not say that. I am sure that CRConrad is acting in good faith. > but you are fine with Yes, I explained why I said it in the post that you are replying to. My biggest mistake was using…
I think that this is extremely simplistic. For example it does not account for individualist anarchism or the collectivist "for our country/nation/race" pushed by various fascist governments.
This also seems to be bi-partisan sadly.
No need to be so hostile and toxic. I only mentioned it because this is an actual argument against TLS that I have seen being used in the past, even by popular sites such as pornhub for example (before being forced to…
I showed that this is incorrect here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28587930 > You go to jail because what you said is actually a crime to say Sounds like the US. Just look at all these people who went to jail…