Don't mistake this as OpenBSD's concern for all BSD's. This is just OpenBSD rant because they isolated themselves by not respecting embargoes in the past. Some ARM CPU's are also vulnerable by the way.
Sadly that doesn't fit OpenBSD's "Intel you suck" narrative.
It's OpenBSD, what else to expect? This is the result of them not respecting embargoes. All they have left is to vent.
They do, they break embargoes and that's why they are now paying the price for it.
I do mind the perception that OSI is some pristine and error-less patron of open source. They're not, they are a business and they will do anything to get more donations. OSI has been known to accept money from anyone.…
Don't mistake this as OpenBSD's concern for all BSD's. This is just OpenBSD rant because they isolated themselves by not respecting embargoes in the past. Some ARM CPU's are also vulnerable by the way.
Sadly that doesn't fit OpenBSD's "Intel you suck" narrative.
It's OpenBSD, what else to expect? This is the result of them not respecting embargoes. All they have left is to vent.
They do, they break embargoes and that's why they are now paying the price for it.
I do mind the perception that OSI is some pristine and error-less patron of open source. They're not, they are a business and they will do anything to get more donations. OSI has been known to accept money from anyone.…