You simply do not say something like “we don’t record continuously” if the reality is that you only record when voice control or speech to text is active. Given the entire industry’s track record, the only sane thing to…
Of course you can. Stockfish plays very different compared to a human, and it never ever blunders or makes mistakes.
That proves what data travels between your computer and the API server, not what data may or may not secretly get shared within processes at the API server.
Valve has in the past given refunds for something that was changed to deliberately no longer work on certain systems. Given that this involves their own hardware devices in this case they're likely to do so here.
Except nobody can prove that those subagents aren't secretly sharing information with the main agent in the backend, and frankly I don't trust Anthropic not to do exactly that to cheese benchmarks.
Given how often dang replies to an @dang post, he clearly has a running search for it. Expecting us to go out of band is ridiculous and won't happen.
There's already been one case where the prompts were allowed to as a subject of discovery, and lying about it is perjury. Lawyers really are probably safe.
Yes, sociopathic tech bros making everything insanely expensive for regular people is indeed incredibly disrespectful!
You’re deliberately bringing up irrelevant minimal counter examples in bad faith.
Yes that is one part of how dog whistles work. Disguise it well enough to get rubes to run interference for you. You’re doing that very well.
This is why you do not disclose anything until the contract is signed.
Doesn't change anything. If you buy something for a certain price, regardless of whatever reasons you have for doing so (including but not limited to, being rich and irresponsible, being insane, or doing it for the…
I think you and I interpreted "this site" differently. I interpreted it as the site being linked to, this referring to the subject of the comment. I think you're interpreting it as hacker news? At this point I'm not…
I did not see any cookies on my machine. Maybe it sets cookies outside of the EU?
It doesn't set cookies so it doesn't have to ask.
"May contain X" labels are usually not allowed here with some exceptions. This has some downsides (like deliberately adding allergens to food because it's impossible to make sure there are absolutely none) but in…
Long time contributors risk expulsion. First time contributors will face additional scrutiny. Slaving over your LLM extrusions to make it appear human made, thereby reading and reviewing it, is an acceptable outcome.
How is saying that a model “causes terror” praise?
You’re right though. It is terrific. (Btw you might want to look up what that word means.)
Not a single person is unaware if their projects are handwritten or vibe coded. Nobody is actually confused or concerned, you are just jaqing off.
That's fine, you're not welcome there anyway.
No, the question is a classic case of jaqing off. Not a single person is in actual doubt which side of the line they fall on. Your second paragraph is a strawman.
In a just world, OpenAI would get the book tossed at them over this because they violated the CFAA.
You’re doing it the wrong way around, try intentionally letting your eyes defocus.
> Wasn't the Amiga essentially limited to interlaced video? No, it supported very high res screens too, but it required special screens such as the A2024 (15" 1024x1024!) Later on there were also RTG graphics cards…
You simply do not say something like “we don’t record continuously” if the reality is that you only record when voice control or speech to text is active. Given the entire industry’s track record, the only sane thing to…
Of course you can. Stockfish plays very different compared to a human, and it never ever blunders or makes mistakes.
That proves what data travels between your computer and the API server, not what data may or may not secretly get shared within processes at the API server.
Valve has in the past given refunds for something that was changed to deliberately no longer work on certain systems. Given that this involves their own hardware devices in this case they're likely to do so here.
Except nobody can prove that those subagents aren't secretly sharing information with the main agent in the backend, and frankly I don't trust Anthropic not to do exactly that to cheese benchmarks.
Given how often dang replies to an @dang post, he clearly has a running search for it. Expecting us to go out of band is ridiculous and won't happen.
There's already been one case where the prompts were allowed to as a subject of discovery, and lying about it is perjury. Lawyers really are probably safe.
Yes, sociopathic tech bros making everything insanely expensive for regular people is indeed incredibly disrespectful!
You’re deliberately bringing up irrelevant minimal counter examples in bad faith.
Yes that is one part of how dog whistles work. Disguise it well enough to get rubes to run interference for you. You’re doing that very well.
This is why you do not disclose anything until the contract is signed.
Doesn't change anything. If you buy something for a certain price, regardless of whatever reasons you have for doing so (including but not limited to, being rich and irresponsible, being insane, or doing it for the…
I think you and I interpreted "this site" differently. I interpreted it as the site being linked to, this referring to the subject of the comment. I think you're interpreting it as hacker news? At this point I'm not…
I did not see any cookies on my machine. Maybe it sets cookies outside of the EU?
It doesn't set cookies so it doesn't have to ask.
"May contain X" labels are usually not allowed here with some exceptions. This has some downsides (like deliberately adding allergens to food because it's impossible to make sure there are absolutely none) but in…
Long time contributors risk expulsion. First time contributors will face additional scrutiny. Slaving over your LLM extrusions to make it appear human made, thereby reading and reviewing it, is an acceptable outcome.
How is saying that a model “causes terror” praise?
You’re right though. It is terrific. (Btw you might want to look up what that word means.)
Not a single person is unaware if their projects are handwritten or vibe coded. Nobody is actually confused or concerned, you are just jaqing off.
That's fine, you're not welcome there anyway.
No, the question is a classic case of jaqing off. Not a single person is in actual doubt which side of the line they fall on. Your second paragraph is a strawman.
In a just world, OpenAI would get the book tossed at them over this because they violated the CFAA.
You’re doing it the wrong way around, try intentionally letting your eyes defocus.
> Wasn't the Amiga essentially limited to interlaced video? No, it supported very high res screens too, but it required special screens such as the A2024 (15" 1024x1024!) Later on there were also RTG graphics cards…