That's actually a major function of fiction. Remember, it's written by real people.
Then it's moot. If one doesn't accept normal court mechanisms in the first place, that overshadows the specific issue of the GP.
It's perfectly possible to have a consistent stance on the tool and feel differently about the tool's application in different circumstances. You're implying that if two things occurred with inverted political parties,…
It is a meaningful argument. Talking about the upsides and downsides of things is what constitutes meaningful argument. Loss of jobs is one of the worst downsides there is. That doesn't mean it's automatically not worth…
Your wording implies you are more biased than your introduction is designed to imply. Otherwise, you wouldn't have described what she is doing as only an action against the customer, rather than as an opposition…
You'll have to start with changing the mission statement at the bottom of your page to remove the term "AI".
I think this is a good idea, but why is "AI" in quotes? It's a pretty obvious/straightforward property to be praised or criticised.
This is easily one of the most egregious examples of the "same people" fallacy I've seen on HN.
It makes me feel actually sick that so many people can't separate their positive feelings about AI from people's misery (it must simply be "complaining"), and vice versa. As if both things can't exist, for some reason.…
It's not a formal "news outlet". You can see what's on-topic at the top of the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Is this going around in other places today, or does posting something to HN qualify as "hype"?
It's unclear why you're arguing for this. We already know about the downsides of low-regulation capitalism. They're still downsides, and we may reasonably continue to talk about them as such. There's a whole genre of…
Criticisms of the format, "the same people", are virtually always irrational/tribalistic, and based on the "invented enemy" internet trope that happens when interpreting groups of people as being one person. I'd like to…
This is the opposite of logical. Missteps and corrections are a sign of conscientiousness, not "making it up".
In any other context I would agree with you, but in software, the point the author is making is quite true. MS would include superfluous icons because they observe it in other software and can't think for themselves, or…
Do not address people in this way. You are contributing to the exact problem we're talking about (how easily it is for information to turn out to be wrong).
It's embarrassing. Instead, they tell themselves, "well, it could have just as easily been real." This has always been the case. However, the more interesting thing going on is that we have never had to reckon with this…
Ha, I know you have to shorten the headline for HN, but you probably should either squeeze in "photographer", or change "capturing" to "Photographing".
>I suspect that many of the loudest voices pushing back against AI coding tools never practiced programming as a hobby or saw it as especially fun, and the fact their job is changing won't make them start now. This…
Essentially every technical person I know.
Key word was "unreliable", not "robot".
I agree that Republicans are probably worse on this topic, but as far as I can tell, the parties are closer to parity on this than they were in 1993. The Democratic party doesn't seem have people like Bill any more.
I am pro-nuclear, and the comic is funny, but of course we extract energy from sugar, coal, fat, and gasoline via oxidation, while we extract energy from uranium via fission. So the more relevant variable being…
Ironic in a good way, you mean? Like employing a counterfeiter to help identify counterfeits? Regardless, I don't think it's correct on this one.
I wish I never had to see this type of comment un-flagged on HN. Every time I do, I feel like I should leave, even though it's the last place on the internet I will engage with. It's a scary leap to make - to have…
That's actually a major function of fiction. Remember, it's written by real people.
Then it's moot. If one doesn't accept normal court mechanisms in the first place, that overshadows the specific issue of the GP.
It's perfectly possible to have a consistent stance on the tool and feel differently about the tool's application in different circumstances. You're implying that if two things occurred with inverted political parties,…
It is a meaningful argument. Talking about the upsides and downsides of things is what constitutes meaningful argument. Loss of jobs is one of the worst downsides there is. That doesn't mean it's automatically not worth…
Your wording implies you are more biased than your introduction is designed to imply. Otherwise, you wouldn't have described what she is doing as only an action against the customer, rather than as an opposition…
You'll have to start with changing the mission statement at the bottom of your page to remove the term "AI".
I think this is a good idea, but why is "AI" in quotes? It's a pretty obvious/straightforward property to be praised or criticised.
This is easily one of the most egregious examples of the "same people" fallacy I've seen on HN.
It makes me feel actually sick that so many people can't separate their positive feelings about AI from people's misery (it must simply be "complaining"), and vice versa. As if both things can't exist, for some reason.…
It's not a formal "news outlet". You can see what's on-topic at the top of the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Is this going around in other places today, or does posting something to HN qualify as "hype"?
It's unclear why you're arguing for this. We already know about the downsides of low-regulation capitalism. They're still downsides, and we may reasonably continue to talk about them as such. There's a whole genre of…
Criticisms of the format, "the same people", are virtually always irrational/tribalistic, and based on the "invented enemy" internet trope that happens when interpreting groups of people as being one person. I'd like to…
This is the opposite of logical. Missteps and corrections are a sign of conscientiousness, not "making it up".
In any other context I would agree with you, but in software, the point the author is making is quite true. MS would include superfluous icons because they observe it in other software and can't think for themselves, or…
Do not address people in this way. You are contributing to the exact problem we're talking about (how easily it is for information to turn out to be wrong).
It's embarrassing. Instead, they tell themselves, "well, it could have just as easily been real." This has always been the case. However, the more interesting thing going on is that we have never had to reckon with this…
Ha, I know you have to shorten the headline for HN, but you probably should either squeeze in "photographer", or change "capturing" to "Photographing".
>I suspect that many of the loudest voices pushing back against AI coding tools never practiced programming as a hobby or saw it as especially fun, and the fact their job is changing won't make them start now. This…
Essentially every technical person I know.
Key word was "unreliable", not "robot".
I agree that Republicans are probably worse on this topic, but as far as I can tell, the parties are closer to parity on this than they were in 1993. The Democratic party doesn't seem have people like Bill any more.
I am pro-nuclear, and the comic is funny, but of course we extract energy from sugar, coal, fat, and gasoline via oxidation, while we extract energy from uranium via fission. So the more relevant variable being…
Ironic in a good way, you mean? Like employing a counterfeiter to help identify counterfeits? Regardless, I don't think it's correct on this one.
I wish I never had to see this type of comment un-flagged on HN. Every time I do, I feel like I should leave, even though it's the last place on the internet I will engage with. It's a scary leap to make - to have…