You ain't bright. If you pee in a cup of someone else's pee, you destroyed evidence. That is what publishing DKIM keys would do. A flood of fake messages to taint and destroy the ability to validate the would-be truth.…
After 5 replies, there isn't much room for logic. Trolls gonna troll... you should consider that. I can help. Fly out, I got a guest room. I guarantee you won't regret it.
I wouldn't want to be a part of anything that denied the truth in favor of civility. Dang, I thought you would have understood that.
What do you call it when someone pees into someone else's pee sample?
LOL! You believe in justice. Learn how the real world works, muggle.
LOL. denial is real. HN is dead. A bunch of VC stroking trumpers. #pathetic
Heavy handed moderators are obviously to blame.
Still ignorant and wrong tho...
You're absolutely right... the other person was ignorant and wrong.
THE PEOPLE WHO RELEASED THE DKIM KEYS WOULD BE GUILTY, YOU COMPLETE DOLT. I didn't claim a crime was committed... you did, you complete dolt. Evidence doesn't imply a crime... you complete dolt. If someone peed in a cup…
A victim used to be able to prove they didn't send a message. A leaker used to be able to prove someone did send a message. Those evidentiary options no longer exist. They were destroyed when the DKIM keys were made…
I'm not the person who said outting people as gay was productive. The other person claimed it could be destructive.
No one is auto-disappearing messages. You are just not understanding. Evidence that used to exist no longer exists as hard evidence. It isn't "hidden"... everything is still there. With secure DKIM justice can be…
Because the DKIM keys were not made public, and a message sent from their account could be confirmed to be authentic. If the keys were public, they could claim forgery. Regardless they could claim their account was…
It doesn't at all. You're misunderstanding. Or, are you using the word "literally" in the modern sense of "not literally"?
By making the DKIM keys public, you are converting solid evidence of something that was said into something that was either really said, or someone else pretended that they said. Evidence was destroyed.
As a hand-waving technical pedantic, you are literally correct. But, "literally" actually has a specific meaning in english, and it's not always to be literal.
> Being gay is not a crime, and yet people can be blackmailed with it. It is very easy to open yourself up to blackmail by perfectly legitimate activities. Option 1: DKIM keys stay private... "That email was just a…
You're misunderstanding how destruction of evidence works.
Yes. We are saying the same thing.
> The threat is not limited to politicians. Anyone (including you and your family members) could be blackmailed or otherwise publicly embarrassed. ... for what they actually did. You think the solution is allowing…
Except your "backyard shed" is actually an uncountable number of your cells that are "edited" (changed using the reprogramming abilities inherent to mRNA, but god forbid you refer to it as such) into not being "backyard…
This isn't about funding... this is about taking a giant leap into mRNA vaccines, that until now have not been approved for human use. We aren't injecting processed proteins into our bloodstream to trigger and train our…
They screwed up by putting themselves in this position where their only hope for a future is desperately trying to distance themselves from what they've done and who they are.
Do you know what "reflection" means? You're not making any sense.
You ain't bright. If you pee in a cup of someone else's pee, you destroyed evidence. That is what publishing DKIM keys would do. A flood of fake messages to taint and destroy the ability to validate the would-be truth.…
After 5 replies, there isn't much room for logic. Trolls gonna troll... you should consider that. I can help. Fly out, I got a guest room. I guarantee you won't regret it.
I wouldn't want to be a part of anything that denied the truth in favor of civility. Dang, I thought you would have understood that.
What do you call it when someone pees into someone else's pee sample?
LOL! You believe in justice. Learn how the real world works, muggle.
LOL. denial is real. HN is dead. A bunch of VC stroking trumpers. #pathetic
Heavy handed moderators are obviously to blame.
Still ignorant and wrong tho...
You're absolutely right... the other person was ignorant and wrong.
THE PEOPLE WHO RELEASED THE DKIM KEYS WOULD BE GUILTY, YOU COMPLETE DOLT. I didn't claim a crime was committed... you did, you complete dolt. Evidence doesn't imply a crime... you complete dolt. If someone peed in a cup…
A victim used to be able to prove they didn't send a message. A leaker used to be able to prove someone did send a message. Those evidentiary options no longer exist. They were destroyed when the DKIM keys were made…
I'm not the person who said outting people as gay was productive. The other person claimed it could be destructive.
No one is auto-disappearing messages. You are just not understanding. Evidence that used to exist no longer exists as hard evidence. It isn't "hidden"... everything is still there. With secure DKIM justice can be…
Because the DKIM keys were not made public, and a message sent from their account could be confirmed to be authentic. If the keys were public, they could claim forgery. Regardless they could claim their account was…
It doesn't at all. You're misunderstanding. Or, are you using the word "literally" in the modern sense of "not literally"?
By making the DKIM keys public, you are converting solid evidence of something that was said into something that was either really said, or someone else pretended that they said. Evidence was destroyed.
As a hand-waving technical pedantic, you are literally correct. But, "literally" actually has a specific meaning in english, and it's not always to be literal.
> Being gay is not a crime, and yet people can be blackmailed with it. It is very easy to open yourself up to blackmail by perfectly legitimate activities. Option 1: DKIM keys stay private... "That email was just a…
You're misunderstanding how destruction of evidence works.
Yes. We are saying the same thing.
> The threat is not limited to politicians. Anyone (including you and your family members) could be blackmailed or otherwise publicly embarrassed. ... for what they actually did. You think the solution is allowing…
Except your "backyard shed" is actually an uncountable number of your cells that are "edited" (changed using the reprogramming abilities inherent to mRNA, but god forbid you refer to it as such) into not being "backyard…
This isn't about funding... this is about taking a giant leap into mRNA vaccines, that until now have not been approved for human use. We aren't injecting processed proteins into our bloodstream to trigger and train our…
They screwed up by putting themselves in this position where their only hope for a future is desperately trying to distance themselves from what they've done and who they are.
Do you know what "reflection" means? You're not making any sense.