Are you assuming that I believe the advent of the Internet and LLMs are the same thing?
If you have no critiques about a piece of technology in an area of technology that has existed for less than 10 years I think that speaks for itself.
Amazing! So was Scheme.
Python was invented two years before Java and didn’t move the needle until the mid 2010s. You are the typical mark for hype cycles. Get a clue will you.
Your reading comprehension is awful. You said “all” as in “all” developers on those projects. You haven’t spoken to all of them to make that claim. You’re just making stuff up. That’s what I was pointing out. If you are…
Let’s not forget we are talking about a world changing technology here. So when you tell me “some people working on some projects are using it”, I’ll pretend you didn’t say “all” because that’s untrue, you haven’t asked…
8 months ago I asked this question, I will ask again: Where are your browsers? Where are your compilers? Where are your databases? Where are your operating systems? Can you point me to literally anything useful that…
Ah your mind hasn’t been fine tuned to the ChatGPT response, I applaud you.
You’re totally right! You’re not building a CLI tool, you’re building a game engine!
Incredibly cringe. Literally every single medium mode problem for a team is framed as a groundbreaking achievement. These people snort their own farts.
Oh go away.
Not convinced that is true.
Yeah, wait until the whole thing is unresponsive due to heat or a bug, you’ll be wishing only your volume button was affected. The fact you can rip open the dashboard and fix something is great what I call a feature,…
We all know the future results of a lame horse.
Sure thing, just like I’ve been checking back on people over the last 3 years. I’ll hit you up too.
I understand and of course I am familiar with the hypothetical you are trying to set up here but I was specifically pointing out a logical fallacy I see banded round all the time by people who should know better or…
I think you’re a troll. We are talking about companies with money that makes countries blush. Let’s not pretend these things exist in a vacuum. Be serious.
Survivorship bias, you don’t know of all the failed projects that couldn’t get off the ground because of incompetent development team and practices that lead a product to its demise, or a product that is possible within…
These two not mutually exclusive? “Wild success” and “going slower than expected”? Wake me up when words have a meaning again.
I’m sorry, what’s the question? Genuinely not sure. I’ll rephrase, Zuckerberg would certainly enjoy agentic coding to be a wild success because it means less staff and more products he could fail to create.
So the success of laying off the majority of your expensive staff doesn’t fit into his calculus at all?
In other words you still believe people are just holding it wrong. Understood.
Friend, you are commenting on a thread where one of the most prominent figures in tech (rightly or wrongly) is saying something did not meet expectations. As far as we can tell this is a man with every incentive to…
Absurd. We are beset on all sides with companies declaring agentic coding a failure and here you are stating as a matter of fact some teams “thrive” with this probabilistic expensive approach to approximating working…
So wait you’ve told it not to make any mistakes or you haven’t? Seems like you’re missing this one easy trick! It’s not about making mistakes, it’s about telling it not to make mistakes!
Are you assuming that I believe the advent of the Internet and LLMs are the same thing?
If you have no critiques about a piece of technology in an area of technology that has existed for less than 10 years I think that speaks for itself.
Amazing! So was Scheme.
Python was invented two years before Java and didn’t move the needle until the mid 2010s. You are the typical mark for hype cycles. Get a clue will you.
Your reading comprehension is awful. You said “all” as in “all” developers on those projects. You haven’t spoken to all of them to make that claim. You’re just making stuff up. That’s what I was pointing out. If you are…
Let’s not forget we are talking about a world changing technology here. So when you tell me “some people working on some projects are using it”, I’ll pretend you didn’t say “all” because that’s untrue, you haven’t asked…
8 months ago I asked this question, I will ask again: Where are your browsers? Where are your compilers? Where are your databases? Where are your operating systems? Can you point me to literally anything useful that…
Ah your mind hasn’t been fine tuned to the ChatGPT response, I applaud you.
You’re totally right! You’re not building a CLI tool, you’re building a game engine!
Incredibly cringe. Literally every single medium mode problem for a team is framed as a groundbreaking achievement. These people snort their own farts.
Oh go away.
Not convinced that is true.
Yeah, wait until the whole thing is unresponsive due to heat or a bug, you’ll be wishing only your volume button was affected. The fact you can rip open the dashboard and fix something is great what I call a feature,…
We all know the future results of a lame horse.
Sure thing, just like I’ve been checking back on people over the last 3 years. I’ll hit you up too.
I understand and of course I am familiar with the hypothetical you are trying to set up here but I was specifically pointing out a logical fallacy I see banded round all the time by people who should know better or…
I think you’re a troll. We are talking about companies with money that makes countries blush. Let’s not pretend these things exist in a vacuum. Be serious.
Survivorship bias, you don’t know of all the failed projects that couldn’t get off the ground because of incompetent development team and practices that lead a product to its demise, or a product that is possible within…
These two not mutually exclusive? “Wild success” and “going slower than expected”? Wake me up when words have a meaning again.
I’m sorry, what’s the question? Genuinely not sure. I’ll rephrase, Zuckerberg would certainly enjoy agentic coding to be a wild success because it means less staff and more products he could fail to create.
So the success of laying off the majority of your expensive staff doesn’t fit into his calculus at all?
In other words you still believe people are just holding it wrong. Understood.
Friend, you are commenting on a thread where one of the most prominent figures in tech (rightly or wrongly) is saying something did not meet expectations. As far as we can tell this is a man with every incentive to…
Absurd. We are beset on all sides with companies declaring agentic coding a failure and here you are stating as a matter of fact some teams “thrive” with this probabilistic expensive approach to approximating working…
So wait you’ve told it not to make any mistakes or you haven’t? Seems like you’re missing this one easy trick! It’s not about making mistakes, it’s about telling it not to make mistakes!