For that kind of money, you could build a new moon. I don't see anything positive about this kind of loss. If anything, it sounds like questionable accounting to reduce the cost of other profits.
Same question. As far as I know, it's a pretty active project. Did the author mean the jump from v. 0.5 to v. 1.0? That had some breaking changes, but that was expected.
If this was intended to be a troll post, it was very successful. What you are advocating is, essentially, linguistic and cultural genocide. It's an appalling point of view. In all seriousness, I would suggest you learn…
Is "discriminant" a word now? I thought performant had pretty much exhausted the possibilities.
Anti-smoking campaigns were offensive and tiring in the 80s. And whoever brought up pigouvian taxation needs a swift slap upside the head.
For that kind of money, you could build a new moon. I don't see anything positive about this kind of loss. If anything, it sounds like questionable accounting to reduce the cost of other profits.
Same question. As far as I know, it's a pretty active project. Did the author mean the jump from v. 0.5 to v. 1.0? That had some breaking changes, but that was expected.
If this was intended to be a troll post, it was very successful. What you are advocating is, essentially, linguistic and cultural genocide. It's an appalling point of view. In all seriousness, I would suggest you learn…
Is "discriminant" a word now? I thought performant had pretty much exhausted the possibilities.
Anti-smoking campaigns were offensive and tiring in the 80s. And whoever brought up pigouvian taxation needs a swift slap upside the head.