Instead of actually thinking about how that could be done, people jump at the lowest hanging fruit to dismiss a thing. Imagine I said "just blow up a building to get rid of it", and people will diss it the same, without…
Like it or not, that increased car traffic delivers more utility. You can't have a car free metropolis. That's a contradiction.
> We were lucky it didn't get stuck worse than it has At some point it makes sense to just blow up the ship to free the channel.
That's like saying that building houses doesn't solve the housing crisis because they are immediately bought. Are you suggesting that Istanbul or London would be just fine with a single bridge?
Instead of actually thinking about how that could be done, people jump at the lowest hanging fruit to dismiss a thing. Imagine I said "just blow up a building to get rid of it", and people will diss it the same, without…
Like it or not, that increased car traffic delivers more utility. You can't have a car free metropolis. That's a contradiction.
> We were lucky it didn't get stuck worse than it has At some point it makes sense to just blow up the ship to free the channel.
That's like saying that building houses doesn't solve the housing crisis because they are immediately bought. Are you suggesting that Istanbul or London would be just fine with a single bridge?