I've found SSL certs for as low as $4/year. At that price, I wouldn't risk free.
This is some crazy-ass shit.
A joke is only funny the first time. Exceptions to this are very rare. This is not one of them.
> Studies show that rapists are not, in general, men who can't get sex another way, but rather men who want to exert power over women. No, they don't. This is not and cannot be the result of any study. This is just…
Not necessarily. Some producers star in their own porn videos. So they pay someone to have sex with them. Still 100% legal. The only difference is the existence of a camera. It's kind of insane.
What are the moral implications of buying a Roomba from Amazon now? Same thing.
We're not talking about rape here. So that's a non-sequitur. You're moving goalposts.
All decisions are made in the face of economic coercion, because every decision is made to cater to one's reward function. What you are saying is absolute nonsense in light of decision theory.
It's not prostitution if you're getting the product/service for free. A whore and a slut are different things.
The way I see it, prostitution is damaging to women because it reduces the value of sex to its fair market value. It reduces women's bargaining power. A man who would like to have sex with a woman of certain parameters…
A victim of human trafficking is not a victim of prostitution. Nor is such victimization any sort of collateral damage, it is direct. Furthermore, the legalization of prostitution will reduce human trafficking (and…
I thought it was obvious, but I'll spell it out for you. A worldview that would seek to ban all employment without proposing some alternative method of partitioning the world's limited resources is nonsensical.
Everything in the universe is impacted by everything else that happens. That's a useless tautology.
Well, it's certainly truer for prostitution than it is for conventional relationships. Use fuzzy logic to process the truth here.
> The reality is that since women make, on average, 2/3 of what men make False. The actual reality is that, when adjusted for skill and seniority, women make just as much as men. This is one of the most malicious…
There is never a balance of power between the employer and the employee. If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have just as much money and influence in the first place. Your…
If each instance of the supposed crime is victimless, where do the supposed victims come from?
I've found SSL certs for as low as $4/year. At that price, I wouldn't risk free.
This is some crazy-ass shit.
A joke is only funny the first time. Exceptions to this are very rare. This is not one of them.
> Studies show that rapists are not, in general, men who can't get sex another way, but rather men who want to exert power over women. No, they don't. This is not and cannot be the result of any study. This is just…
Not necessarily. Some producers star in their own porn videos. So they pay someone to have sex with them. Still 100% legal. The only difference is the existence of a camera. It's kind of insane.
What are the moral implications of buying a Roomba from Amazon now? Same thing.
We're not talking about rape here. So that's a non-sequitur. You're moving goalposts.
All decisions are made in the face of economic coercion, because every decision is made to cater to one's reward function. What you are saying is absolute nonsense in light of decision theory.
It's not prostitution if you're getting the product/service for free. A whore and a slut are different things.
The way I see it, prostitution is damaging to women because it reduces the value of sex to its fair market value. It reduces women's bargaining power. A man who would like to have sex with a woman of certain parameters…
A victim of human trafficking is not a victim of prostitution. Nor is such victimization any sort of collateral damage, it is direct. Furthermore, the legalization of prostitution will reduce human trafficking (and…
I thought it was obvious, but I'll spell it out for you. A worldview that would seek to ban all employment without proposing some alternative method of partitioning the world's limited resources is nonsensical.
Everything in the universe is impacted by everything else that happens. That's a useless tautology.
Well, it's certainly truer for prostitution than it is for conventional relationships. Use fuzzy logic to process the truth here.
> The reality is that since women make, on average, 2/3 of what men make False. The actual reality is that, when adjusted for skill and seniority, women make just as much as men. This is one of the most malicious…
There is never a balance of power between the employer and the employee. If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have just as much money and influence in the first place. Your…
If each instance of the supposed crime is victimless, where do the supposed victims come from?