just to argue against myself: from inhance's website: When Inhance first became aware of the potential for fluorination to unintentionally form miniscule quantities of certain PFAS impurities, the Company researched and…
but in this particular case: The EPA move came after the agency determined that types of PFAS created during the fluorination process “are highly toxic and present unreasonable risks that cannot be prevented other than…
I can't tell from the article what he purchased but it wouldn't suprise me if it was a security only available to accredited investors.
i'm not sure which i think is more likely: 1) a multiperson zoom of deep fakes fooled the worker 2) the worker was in on it as an inside man and the deep fake story is cover
did the tow truck driver attempt to mislead or cover up what happened?
"The study observed groups of data-entry workers in India working from home and from the office."
just to argue against myself: from inhance's website: When Inhance first became aware of the potential for fluorination to unintentionally form miniscule quantities of certain PFAS impurities, the Company researched and…
but in this particular case: The EPA move came after the agency determined that types of PFAS created during the fluorination process “are highly toxic and present unreasonable risks that cannot be prevented other than…
I can't tell from the article what he purchased but it wouldn't suprise me if it was a security only available to accredited investors.
i'm not sure which i think is more likely: 1) a multiperson zoom of deep fakes fooled the worker 2) the worker was in on it as an inside man and the deep fake story is cover
did the tow truck driver attempt to mislead or cover up what happened?
"The study observed groups of data-entry workers in India working from home and from the office."