It's supremely arrogant to tell your users to change the kernel they are using because you couldn't be bothered to fix a regression in your code. The problem with that approach is self-evident.
Claiming that Chrome pioneered sandboxing doesn't pass the smell test, irrespective of how many Google employees (according to your profile) are backing you up.
Not really. You have to see the supreme irony in a company which is ditching suppport for very recent kernels in the name of security when the app in question is designed primarily to spy on your browsing habits (and…
Google invented sandboxing in client apps? I don't know who's more arrogant - Google or their fawning fanboys.
To be fair Google's whole business model is based on spying on people to gather data for ad placement. If we're being entirely honest a browser which sends every url you visit to Google by default is spyware.
It's supremely arrogant to tell your users to change the kernel they are using because you couldn't be bothered to fix a regression in your code. The problem with that approach is self-evident.
Claiming that Chrome pioneered sandboxing doesn't pass the smell test, irrespective of how many Google employees (according to your profile) are backing you up.
Not really. You have to see the supreme irony in a company which is ditching suppport for very recent kernels in the name of security when the app in question is designed primarily to spy on your browsing habits (and…
Google invented sandboxing in client apps? I don't know who's more arrogant - Google or their fawning fanboys.
To be fair Google's whole business model is based on spying on people to gather data for ad placement. If we're being entirely honest a browser which sends every url you visit to Google by default is spyware.